ArticleFuture healthcare journal2021
The rise and rise of NMAHPs in UK clinical research.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The value of allied health professional research engagement on healthcare performance: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Factors Affecting Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals' Ability to Engage With Research.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Validating the Doctoral and Academic Writing in Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Profession Survey Questionnaire for Writing Group Interventions.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Securing the future of AHP research: mapping UK practitioner-academic/clinical-academic roles and sustainability.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Review
- Proceed with care and intention: Factors to consider when introducing a doctoral-level route to occupational therapy registration in the UK.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024Article
- Understanding the value of a doctorate for allied health professionals in practice in the UK: a survey.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Development of a framework and research impact capture tool for nursing, midwifery, allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs).BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The RESearch PARamedic Experience (RESPARE) study: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of research paramedics working in the United Kingdom.British paramedic journal · 2023Article
- Embedding research (ER) led by nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs): the NMAHP-ER model.BMJ leader · 2022Article
- Ten years of NIHR research training: perceptions of the programmes: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Reflections on contributing to health research: A qualitative interview study with research participants and patient advisors.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, the role of nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs) have been transformed within the UK research community. Assisted by new funding opportunities and a recognition of their role in interdisciplinary working, NMAHPs are driving innovative patient care. Challenges still remain to maximise the potential of NHAMPs in clinical research; signposting opportunities to become involved in research, promoting clear career pathways and developing innovative roles with the NHS to attract and retain this community are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.