ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2021
Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluations of Penumbra Reduction Using Multi-Leaf Collimator and 3D Bolus in Scanned Proton Therapy.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Use of apertures in single-energy pristine Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Towards ultra-fast treatments: large energy acceptance beam delivery systems and opportunities for proton beam therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Range-compensated pencil beam scanning proton Arc therapy: a feasibility study.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Design, fabrication, commissioning, and dosimetric verification of a GRID collimator for proton SFRT on a compact proton therapy machine.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The Cut-Sort-Group algorithm for efficient delivery of collimated step-and-shoot proton arc therapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The LET enhancement of energy-specific collimation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Future Treatment Strategies for Cancer Patients Combining Targeted Alpha Therapy with Pillars of Cancer Treatment: External Beam Radiation Therapy, Checkpoint Inhibition Immunotherapy, Cytostatic Chemotherapy, and Brachytherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Modelling small block aperture in an in-house developed GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo-based dose engine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2023Article
- Design, testing and characterization of a proton central axis alignment device for the dynamic collimation system.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2023Article
- Measurements of fetal dose with Mevion S250i proton therapy system with HYPERSCAN.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- A novel optimization algorithm for enabling dynamically collimated proton arc therapy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Collimating individual beamlets in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, a dosimetric investigation.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe development of collimating technologies has become a recent focus in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy to improve the target conformity and healthy tissue sparing through field-specific or energy-layer-specific collimation. Given the growing popularity of collimators for low-energy treatments, the purpose of this work was to summarize the recent literature that has focused on the efficacy of collimators for PBS and highlight the development of clinical and preclinical collimators. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe collimators presented in this work were organized into 3 categories: per-field apertures, multileaf collimators (MLCs), and sliding-bar collimators. For each case, the system design and planning methodologies are summarized and intercompared from their existing literature. Energy-specific collimation is still a new paradigm in PBS and the 2 specific collimators tailored toward PBS are presented including the dynamic collimation system (DCS) and the Mevion Adaptive Aperture.
resultsCollimation during PBS can improve the target conformity and associated healthy tissue and critical structure avoidance. Between energy-specific collimators and static apertures, static apertures have the poorest dose conformity owing to collimating only the largest projection of a target in the beam's eye view but still provide an improvement over uncollimated treatments. While an external collimator increases secondary neutron production, the benefit of collimating the primary beam appears to outweigh the risk. The greatest benefit has been observed for low- energy treatment sites.
conclusionThe consensus from current literature supports the use of external collimators in PBS under certain conditions, namely low-energy treatments or where the nominal spot size is large. While many recent studies paint a supportive picture, it is also important to understand the limitations of collimation in PBS that are specific to each collimator type. The emergence and paradigm of energy-specific collimation holds many promises for PBS proton therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.