Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285937›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2021

Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Daniel E Hyer, Laura C Bennett, Theodore J Geoghegan, Martin Bues, Blake R Smith

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Use of apertures in single-energy pristine Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel E HyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Laura C BennettDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Theodore J GeogheganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Martin BuesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Blake R SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
University of Iowa · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Sharpening the edge in pencil-beam proton therapy: an aftermarket collimation system to better spare normal tissue during radiation treatmentR37CA226518 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HYER, DANIEL ELLIS · 2018 to 2024
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA226518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe development of collimating technologies has become a recent focus in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy to improve the target conformity and healthy tissue sparing through field-specific or energy-layer-specific collimation. Given the growing popularity of collimators for low-energy treatments, the purpose of this work was to summarize the recent literature that has focused on the efficacy of collimators for PBS and highlight the development of clinical and preclinical collimators. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe collimators presented in this work were organized into 3 categories: per-field apertures, multileaf collimators (MLCs), and sliding-bar collimators. For each case, the system design and planning methodologies are summarized and intercompared from their existing literature. Energy-specific collimation is still a new paradigm in PBS and the 2 specific collimators tailored toward PBS are presented including the dynamic collimation system (DCS) and the Mevion Adaptive Aperture.

resultsCollimation during PBS can improve the target conformity and associated healthy tissue and critical structure avoidance. Between energy-specific collimators and static apertures, static apertures have the poorest dose conformity owing to collimating only the largest projection of a target in the beam's eye view but still provide an improvement over uncollimated treatments. While an external collimator increases secondary neutron production, the benefit of collimating the primary beam appears to outweigh the risk. The greatest benefit has been observed for low- energy treatment sites.

conclusionThe consensus from current literature supports the use of external collimators in PBS under certain conditions, namely low-energy treatments or where the nominal spot size is large. While many recent studies paint a supportive picture, it is also important to understand the limitations of collimation in PBS that are specific to each collimator type. The emergence and paradigm of energy-specific collimation holds many promises for PBS proton therapy.

Indexed as

collimationPBSproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID34285937
PMCPMC8270095
OpenAlexW3176087457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.