ArticleCureus2021
Repeatability of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3.0 Tesla in Normal Pancreas.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: A narrative review.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Stability and repeatability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of normal pancreas on 5.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) test-retest repeatability of the normal pancreas based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
methodsTwenty-six healthy volunteers (mean 47.6 years; 13 men) were included and scanned twice with reposition for a DWI sequence at 3.0-T. Two readers measured the ADCs of pancreatic head, body and tail for two DWIs, independently. The mean ADCs of the pancreatic head, body and tail were calculated as the global pancreatic ADC. Test-retest repeatability and agreement of ADC measurement were evaluated by the Bland-Altman analysis, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV).
resultsThe global pancreatic ADC showed the best test-retest repeatability (mean difference ± limits of agreement were 0.05 ± 0.25×10
conclusionsThe best test-retest repeatability of ADC in the normal pancreas was only for the whole pancreas with a CV of 6%. Cautions should be taken in interpreting longitudinal clinical changes in ADC values of the normal pancreas for the measurements do have an inherent variability by locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.