Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285775›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021

Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis.

Milan Picard, Marie-Pier Scott-Boyer, Antoine Bodein, Olivier Périn, Arnaud Droit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 344 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
344citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

344 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review

284 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Milan PicardMolecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Marie-Pier Scott-BoyerMolecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Antoine BodeinMolecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Olivier PérinDigital Sciences Department, L'Oréal Advanced Research, Aulnay-sous-bois, France.
Arnaud DroitMolecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased availability of high-throughput technologies has generated an ever-growing number of omics data that seek to portray many different but complementary biological layers including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. New insight from these data have been obtained by machine learning algorithms that have produced diagnostic and classification biomarkers. Most biomarkers obtained to date however only include one omic measurement at a time and thus do not take full advantage of recent multi-omics experiments that now capture the entire complexity of biological systems. Multi-omics data integration strategies are needed to combine the complementary knowledge brought by each omics layer. We have summarized the most recent data integration methods/ frameworks into five different integration strategies: early, mixed, intermediate, late and hierarchical. In this mini-review, we focus on challenges and existing multi-omics integration strategies by paying special attention to machine learning applications.

Indexed as

Deep learningIntegration strategyMachine learningMulti-omicsMulti-viewNetwork

Identifiers

PMID34285775
PMCPMC8258788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.