Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285503›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2021

Training General Practitioners and Medical Assistants Within the Framework of HoPES3, a Holistic Care Program for Elderly Patients to Integrate Spiritual Needs, Social Activity, and Self-Care into Disease Management in Primary Care.

Elke Kunsmann-Leutiger, Cornelia Straßner, Friederike Schalhorn, Regina Stolz, Gabriele Stotz-Ingenlath, Nicola Buhlinger-Göpfarth, Martina Bentner, Stefanie Joos, Jan Valentini, Eckhard Frick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elke Kunsmann-Leutiger *Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Cornelia Straßner *Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Friederike SchalhornInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Regina StolzInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1127-3090
Gabriele Stotz-IngenlathDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nicola Buhlinger-GöpfarthDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martina BentnerDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jan ValentiniInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Eckhard FrickDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6753-1004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study presents a concept for training general practitioners (GPs) in taking a spiritual history. In the same workshop, medical assistants (MAs) were trained in counselling elderly, chronically ill patients on social activities and home remedies. After the training, GPs and MAs will apply the acquired skills in their practices within the scope of the HoPES3 intervention study, which aims at raising patients' self-efficacy.

methodsSixteen GPs and 18 MAs were trained in a 5-hour workshop and completed an evaluation questionnaire.

resultsAll participants reported great satisfaction. In particular, 85% of GPs (n=11) affirmed increased capacity to address patients' spiritual needs. About 88% (n=15) of MAs were satisfied with the training, yet expressed difficulties in integrating theoretical knowledge into daily professional routine. DISCUSSION: While the evaluation of the workshop is promising, the results of the randomized-controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the complete HoPES3 intervention have to be awaited.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first interdisciplinary, holistic care training in primary care in Germany. It fosters GPs' and MAs' competency in providing a proactive support in spirituality, social activities, and home remedies to their patients. If the concept proves to be effective, it could be integrated into existing care models and curriculums and provide clear guidance on how to consider elderly patients' spiritual needs and strengthen their self-efficacy in primary care settings.

Indexed as

elderly patientsholistic caremedical assistentsprimary carespiritual care

Identifiers

PMID34285503
PMCPMC8286253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.