Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285444›Full record

ReviewActa clinica Croatica2020

THE USE OF ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY AND OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA.

Din Duraković, Ante Silić, Vjekoslav Peitl, Rašeljka Tadić, Kristina Lončarić, Trpimir Glavina, Daniela Šago, Ljiljana Pačić Turk, Dalibor Karlović

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Retinal layers and symptoms and inflammation in schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Din Duraković1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ante Silić1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Vjekoslav Peitl1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Rašeljka Tadić1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Kristina Lončarić1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Trpimir Glavina1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Daniela Šago1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ljiljana Pačić Turk1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dalibor Karlović1Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of electroretinography (ERG) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) has currently expanded beyond ophthalmology alone. The aim of this review is to present the results and knowledge acquired by these two methods in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Reviewing the studies applying ERG and OCT methods in the field of psychiatry, one can conclude that results of the research imply morphological and functional changes of retina in patients with schizophrenia that are not consistent. However, in most studies there was reduction of the amplitude and changes in the implicit time related parameters on ERG and thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer on OCT. Neurons in the eye use the same neurotransmitters as neurons in the basal brain structures that are most affected in schizophrenia, according to the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Unlike neurons in the basal brain structures, the neurons in the eye are

Indexed as

ElectroretinographySchizophreniaHumansRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceElectroretinographyNeuroophthalmologyOptical coherence tomographySchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID34285444
PMCPMC8253076
OpenAlexW3182569314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.