Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285439›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2020

TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC FEMORAL FRACTURES IN THE CITY OF ZAGREB.

Anko Antabak, Nikolina Boršćak, Marija Čagalj, Renato Ivelj, Igor Bumči, Dino Papeš, Stanko Ćavar, Marko Bogović, Krešimir Bulić, Tomislav Luetić

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anko Antabak1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nikolina Boršćak1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marija Čagalj1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Renato Ivelj1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Igor Bumči1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dino Papeš1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Stanko Ćavar1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marko Bogović1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Krešimir Bulić1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tomislav Luetić1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia.
University Hospital Centre Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Femur fractures in children can be treated with a number of operative and conservative methods. Numerous factors determine which method is optimal for a specific fracture. The aim of this research was to analyze distribution of femur fractures in children living in the urban communities of Zagreb and Zagreb County by localization, type and frequency of treatment methods used according to age and fracture mechanism. The research included 103 children aged up to 18 years, treated for femur fractures at the Zagreb University Hospital Centre and Zagreb Children's Hospital. Data were collected from these institutions and a retrospective study covered the 2010-2015 period. The cause of fracture and diagnosis were coded with the help of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Operative treatment was applied in 55% of cases, which is contrary to previous researches. The highest incidence of femur fractures was recorded in the 0- to 4-year age groups, accounting for 49.1% of all fractures. These fractures mostly occurred due to falls and were more often treated with non-operative methods. All other age groups were mostly treated with operative methods. Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods, whereas flexible intramedullary nailing was the most frequently used operative method. The treatment depended on age, complexity of the fracture, fracture type, fragment displacement, and associated injuries. The cause was also an important factor on choosing the treatment method. Non-operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by falls (64.71% of cases due to falls) and operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by traffic accidents (79.4% of cases due to traffic accidents). It is a wide-known opinion that the best treatment for femur fractures in children is non-operative treatment. However, recent studies have shown that the use of operative methods in femur fracture treatment is growing. Our cohort of children treated during a five-year period (2010-2015) also underwent operative treatment more often than non-operative one. Two non-operative and eight operative methods were used. With such a large number of methods, it is clear that there is no unique method for all fractures. However, it is clear that the trend of using operative treatment is connected to the perennial trend of considerable sociodemographic and socioeconomic changes in urban settings such as Zagreb. Lifestyle changes directly affect the prevalence of femur fractures among children, as well as approach to treatment choice. General opinion is that most of fractures that occur at an early age can be treated with non-operative methods. Our research on femur fractures in children confirmed this rule. The youngest age group that had the highest incidence of fractures (49.1% of all fractures) was treated with non-operative methods in 75% of cases. Operative methods prevailed in other age groups. Similar results have been published by other authors. In conclusion, nearly half of all femur fractures (49.1%) occurred at a young age (0-4 years). Diaphysis fractures were most common. Most of the fractures that occurred during the 2010-2015 period were treated with operative methods, mostly in children aged 5-9 years. Out of eight different operative methods, elastic stable intramedullary osteosynthesis was most frequently used (60%). Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryAccidental FallsChildChild, PreschoolFemurFracture Fixation, InternalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRetrospective StudiesChildFemurFractureTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34285439
PMCPMC8253082
OpenAlexW3185439568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.