Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285434›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2020

NUTRITIONAL RISK SCREENING IN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL PATIENTS AT THE RIJEKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTRE.

Sandra Pavičić Žeželj, Danijela Malec, Dolores Janko-Labinac, Tamara Šoić Vranić, Gordana Mičetić Balog, Tea Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić, Tea Čaljkušić Mance, Damir Kovačević, Olga Cvijanović Peloza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sandra Pavičić Žeželj1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Danijela Malec1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Dolores Janko-Labinac1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Tamara Šoić Vranić1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Gordana Mičetić Balog1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Tea Schnurrer-Luke-Vrbanić1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Tea Čaljkušić Mance1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Damir Kovačević1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.
Olga Cvijanović Peloza1Department of Health Ecology, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 3Department of Neurology, Pula General Hospital, Pula, Croatia; 4Department of Anatomy, University of Rijeka, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia; 5Health Centre of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Rijeka, Croatia; 6Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia; 7Department of Ophthalmology, Rijeka University Hospital Centre, Rijeka, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malnutrition is usually related to some diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, chronic pancreatitis, chronic liver disease and malignant tumors. It is characterized by weight loss, protein deficiency, and deficit of specific nutrients. The aim was to estimate the prevalence of nutritional risk among 160 gastrointestinal patients by use of the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) score at hospital admission and discharge. The patients stayed in the hospital between 5 and 15 days or longer. Results showed that 40% of patients at admission and 36.2% at discharge were malnourished. There were 53.1% of patients with recognized malnutrition at admission that received nutritional support, whereas at discharge 34.4% of patients at risk were not dietary supported. Malnourished patients were significantly older, had lower body mass index, longer hospital stay and higher rate of malignant diseases than properly nourished patients. Regular screening for malnutrition should be conveyed in hospitals as to provide appropriate dietary support for all patients at risk.

Indexed as

MalnutritionNutrition AssessmentHospitalizationHospitals, UniversityHumansLength of StayNutritional StatusProspective StudiesGastroenterological patientsMalnutritionNutrition Risk Screening (NRS 2002)

Identifiers

PMID34285434
PMCPMC8253059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.