Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285365›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Response to substrate limitation by a marine sulfate-reducing bacterium.

Angeliki Marietou, Kasper U Kjeldsen, Clemens Glombitza, Bo Barker Jørgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  5. Proteomics and EPS Compositional Analysis RevealsMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The metabolic rate of the biosphere and its components.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angeliki MarietouSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. a.marietou@bio.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-0067
Kasper U KjeldsenSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clemens GlombitzaInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Bo Barker JørgensenSection for Microbiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-8027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) in subsurface sediments live under constant substrate and energy limitation, yet little is known about how they adapt to this mode of life. We combined controlled chemostat cultivation and transcriptomics to examine how the marine sulfate reducer, Desulfobacterium autotrophicum, copes with substrate (sulfate or lactate) limitation. The half-saturation uptake constant (K

Indexed as

DeltaproteobacteriaSulfatesBacteriaOxidation-ReductionSulfur OxidesSulfatesSulfur Oxides

Identifiers

PMID34285365
PMCPMC8692349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.