Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285339›Full record

ReviewJournal of human genetics2021

Functional genomics for breast cancer drug target discovery.

Tetsuro Yoshimaru, Yusuke Nakamura, Toyomasa Katagiri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tetsuro YoshimaruDivision of Genome Medicine, Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8582-3011
Yusuke NakamuraCancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Toyomasa KatagiriDivision of Genome Medicine, Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan. tkatagi@genome.tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5086-7444

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) 19191248Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) JP20H00543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that develops through a multistep process via the accumulation of genetic/epigenetic alterations in various cancer-related genes. Current treatment options for breast cancer patients include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy including conventional cytotoxic and molecular-targeted anticancer drugs for each intrinsic subtype, such as endocrine therapy and antihuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. However, these therapies often fail to prevent recurrence and metastasis due to resistance. Overall, understanding the molecular mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis and progression will help to establish therapeutic modalities to improve treatment. The recent development of comprehensive omics technologies has led to the discovery of driver genes, including oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes, contributing to the development of molecular-targeted anticancer drugs. Here, we review the development of anticancer drugs targeting cancer-specific functional therapeutic targets, namely, MELK (maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase), TOPK (T-lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase), and BIG3 (brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange protein 3), as identified through comprehensive breast cancer transcriptomics.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryGenomicsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID34285339
PMCPMC8384626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.