Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285291›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

SpheroidPicker for automated 3D cell culture manipulation using deep learning.

Istvan Grexa, Akos Diosdi, Maria Harmati, Andras Kriston, Nikita Moshkov, Krisztina Buzas, Vilja Pietiäinen, Krisztian Koos, Peter Horvath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Automated high-content imaging in iPSC-derived neuronal progenitors.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Istvan GrexaSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Akos DiosdiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Maria HarmatiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Andras KristonSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Nikita MoshkovSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Krisztina BuzasSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Vilja PietiäinenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Krisztian KoosSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Peter HorvathSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), Temesvári körút 62, Szeged, 6726, Hungary. hovath.peter@brc.hu.
University of Szeged · HUHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUHungarian Research NetworkNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RUUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent statistics report that more than 3.7 million new cases of cancer occur in Europe yearly, and the disease accounts for approximately 20% of all deaths. High-throughput screening of cancer cell cultures has dominated the search for novel, effective anticancer therapies in the past decades. Recently, functional assays with patient-derived ex vivo 3D cell culture have gained importance for drug discovery and precision medicine. We recently evaluated the major advancements and needs for the 3D cell culture screening, and concluded that strictly standardized and robust sample preparation is the most desired development. Here we propose an artificial intelligence-guided low-cost 3D cell culture delivery system. It consists of a light microscope, a micromanipulator, a syringe pump, and a controller computer. The system performs morphology-based feature analysis on spheroids and can select uniform sized or shaped spheroids to transfer them between various sample holders. It can select the samples from standard sample holders, including Petri dishes and microwell plates, and then transfer them to a variety of holders up to 384 well plates. The device performs reliable semi- and fully automated spheroid transfer. This results in highly controlled experimental conditions and eliminates non-trivial side effects of sample variability that is a key aspect towards next-generation precision medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorDeep LearningDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSpheroids, Cellular

Identifiers

PMID34285291
PMCPMC8292460
OpenAlexW3185529754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.