Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285290›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Validation of real-time RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Republic of Korea.

Yoon-Seok Chung, Nam-Joo Lee, Sang Hee Woo, Jeong-Min Kim, Heui Man Kim, Hye Jun Jo, Ye Eun Park, Myung-Guk Han

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Highly Adsorptive Au-TiOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022
    Article
  19. RSC advances · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoon-Seok ChungDivision of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Honam Regional Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, Gwangju-si, 61947, Republic of Korea.
Nam-Joo LeeDivision of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Bureau of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju-si, 28159, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hee WooDivision of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Bureau of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju-si, 28159, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Min KimDivision of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Bureau of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju-si, 28159, Republic of Korea.
Heui Man KimDivision of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Bureau of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju-si, 28159, Republic of Korea.
Hye Jun JoDivision of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Bureau of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju-si, 28159, Republic of Korea.
Ye Eun ParkDivision of Laboratory Diagnosis Management, Bureau of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju-si, 28159, Republic of Korea.
Myung-Guk HanDivision of Viral Diseases, Bureau of Infectious Disease Diagnosis Control, Korea Diseases Control and Prevention Agency, 187 Osongsaengmyeong2-ro, Osong-eup, Heungdeok-gu, Cheongju-si, 28159, Republic of Korea. mghan@korea.kr.
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency · KR

Funding

This work was supported by Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . [grant number 4800-4837-301]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay that does not require Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) reagents was tested and validated for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the early stages of the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Republic of Korea. Early diagnosis of COVID-19 enables timely treatment and the implementation of public health measures. We validated the sensitivity, specificity, precision, linearity, accuracy, and robustness of the RT-qPCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection and compared its performance with that of several EUA-approved kits. Our RT-qPCR assay was highly specific for SARS-CoV-2 as demonstrated by not amplifying 13 other viruses that cause respiratory diseases. The assay showed high linearity using a viral isolate from a patient with known COVID-19 as well as plasmids containing target SARS-CoV-2 genes as templates. The assay showed good repeatability and reproducibility with a coefficient of variation of 3%, and a SARS-CoV-2 limit of detection of 1 PFU/mL. The RT-qPCR-based assay is highly effective and can facilitate the early diagnosis of COVID-19 without the use of EUA-approved kits or reagents in the Republic of Korea.

Indexed as

AnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingHumansLimit of DetectionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionVero Cells

Identifiers

PMID34285290
PMCPMC8292370
OpenAlexW3184720530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.