Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34285058›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Primary care physicians' perceptions of the role of alternative payment models in recruitment and retention in rural Alberta: a qualitative study.

Yewande Ogundeji, Fiona Clement, Darryn Wellstead, Brenlea Farkas, Braden Manns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Do compensation models affect family physician job satisfaction? Scoping review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  3. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  4. Supporting future and current rural physicians.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Payment model impact on the resilience of rural communities: Exploratory study.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yewande OgundejiDepartments of Community Health Sciences (Ogundeji, Clement, Wellstead, Farkas, Manns) and Medicine (Clement, Manns), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. yewande.ogundeji@ucalgary.ca ykogundeji@gmail.com Braden.Manns@albertahealthservices.ca.
Fiona ClementDepartments of Community Health Sciences (Ogundeji, Clement, Wellstead, Farkas, Manns) and Medicine (Clement, Manns), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Darryn WellsteadDepartments of Community Health Sciences (Ogundeji, Clement, Wellstead, Farkas, Manns) and Medicine (Clement, Manns), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Brenlea FarkasDepartments of Community Health Sciences (Ogundeji, Clement, Wellstead, Farkas, Manns) and Medicine (Clement, Manns), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Braden MannsDepartments of Community Health Sciences (Ogundeji, Clement, Wellstead, Farkas, Manns) and Medicine (Clement, Manns), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. yewande.ogundeji@ucalgary.ca ykogundeji@gmail.com Braden.Manns@albertahealthservices.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite well-documented challenges in recruiting physicians to rural practice, few Canadian studies have described the role physician payment models may play in attracting and retaining physicians to rural practice. This study examined the perspectives of rural primary care physicians on the factors that attract and retain physicians in rural locations, including the role that alternative payment models (APMs) might play.

methodsThis was a qualitative study involving in-depth, open-ended interviews with rural primary care physicians practising under fee-for-service (FFS) models and APMs in Alberta, Canada. Participants were recruited from the Rural Health Professions Action Plan member list (consisting of physicians practising in rural or remote locations in Alberta) and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta online database. Interviews were conducted April to June 2020, and data were analyzed using a thematic framework approach.

resultsFourteen physicians were interviewed. There were 5 themes identified: factors that attract physicians to rural practice, barriers and challenges associated with rural practice, the potential role of APMs in recruitment and retention, factors that physicians consider in deciding to change payment models, and physician perceptions of APMs compared with FFS models. Participants expressed that APMs may have some role to play in retaining rural physicians but identified professional challenges, and family-related and personal factors as key determinants. Most FFS physicians indicated that they were interested in exploring APMs provided specific concerns were addressed (e.g., clear and adequately compensated APM contracts, and physician involvement in the development of APMs).

interpretationPrimary care physicians practising in rural regions in Alberta view payment models as one consideration among many in their decision to pursue rural practice. Alternative payment model contracts designed with the input of physicians may have a role to play in attracting and retaining physicians to rural practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysician's RoleAlbertaDecision MakingFactor Analysis, StatisticalFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMalePhysicians, Primary CareQualitative ResearchReimbursement MechanismsRisk FactorsRural Health Services

Identifiers

PMID34285058
PMCPMC8313092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.