ArticleChinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi2021
Application of machine learning to predict the outcome of pediatric traumatic brain injury.
Article in Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric Predictive Artificial Intelligence Implemented in Clinical Practice from 2010 to 2021: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Applications of machine learning in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI): a systematic review of the literature.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic applications of machine learning in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of single and multimodal approaches.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Contribution of artificial intelligence research to the development of inclusive applications for people with disabilities: A scoping review (2015-2025).PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Pediatric road traffic accident - related head injury: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Ghana.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Toward Child-Centred Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: A Perspective on Clinical Decision Support, Stakeholder Engagement and Education.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Use of artificial intelligence for outcome assessment in pediatric rehabilitation: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The Expanding Frontier: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroradiology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Employing machine learning for early detection of poly-victimization in rural children: a survey study in China's Chaoshan region.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Mental Health Sequelae Following Concussion in Youth.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Behavioral outcome prediction among children using machine learning.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Neurocritical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury : Past, Present and Future.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Unveiling the Influence of AI Predictive Analytics on Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging.World neurosurgery: X · 2023Article
- Hospital mortality prediction in traumatic injuries patients: comparing different SMOTE-based machine learning algorithms.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence within pediatric critical care.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- Predicting Outcome in Patients with Brain Injury: Differences between Machine Learning versus Conventional Statistics.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Towards PErsonalised PRognosis for children with traumatic brain injury: the PEPR study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraumatic brain injury (TBI) generally causes mortality and disability, particularly in children. Machine learning (ML) is a computer algorithm, applied as a clinical prediction tool. The present study aims to assess the predictability of ML for the functional outcomes of pediatric TBI.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed targeting children with TBI who were admitted to the trauma center of southern Thailand between January 2009 and July 2020. The patient was excluded if he/she (1) did not undergo a CT scan of the brain, (2) died within the first 24 h, (3) had unavailable complete medical records during admission, or (4) was unable to provide updated outcomes. Clinical and radiologic characteristics were collected such as vital signs, Glasgow coma scale score, and characteristics of intracranial injuries. The functional outcome was assessed using the King's Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury, which was thus dichotomized into favourable outcomes and unfavourable outcomes: good recovery and moderate disability were categorized as the former, whereas death, vegetative state, and severe disability were categorized as the latter. The prognostic factors were estimated using traditional binary logistic regression. By data splitting, 70% of data were used for training the ML models and the remaining 30% were used for testing the ML models. The supervised algorithms including support vector machines, neural networks, random forest, logistic regression, naive Bayes and k-nearest neighbor were performed for training of the ML models. Therefore, the ML models were tested for the predictive performances by the testing datasets.
resultsThere were 828 patients in the cohort. The median age was 72 months (interquartile range 104.7 months, range 2-179 months). Road traffic accident was the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 68.7%. At hospital discharge, favourable outcomes were achieved in 97.0% of patients, while the mortality rate was 2.2%. Glasgow coma scale score, hypotension, pupillary light reflex, and subarachnoid haemorrhage were associated with TBI outcomes following traditional binary logistic regression; hence, the 4 prognostic factors were used for building ML models and testing performance. The support vector machine model had the best performance for predicting pediatric TBI outcomes: sensitivity 0.95, specificity 0.60, positive predicted value 0.99, negative predictive value 1.0; accuracy 0.94, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78.
conclusionThe ML algorithms of the present study have a high sensitivity; therefore they have the potential to be screening tools for predicting functional outcomes and counselling prognosis in general practice of pediatric TBIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.