Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34284754›Full record

Observational studyBMC palliative care2021

Before the 2020 Pandemic: an observational study exploring public knowledge, attitudes, plans, and preferences towards death and end of life care in Wales.

Ishrat Islam, Annmarie Nelson, Mirella Longo, Anthony Byrne

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ishrat IslamMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1395-8173
Annmarie NelsonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK. NelsonA9@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6075-8425
Mirella LongoMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9867-3806
Anthony ByrneMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1413-1496

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-CMarie Curie Cancer Care MCCC-FCO-17-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding public attitudes towards death and dying is important to inform public policies around End of Life Care (EoLC). We studied the public attitudes towards death and dying in Wales.

methodsAn online survey was conducted in 2018. Social media and the HealthWiseWales platform were used to recruit participants. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

results2,210 people participated. Loss of independence (84%), manner of death, and leaving their beloved behind were the biggest fears around death and dying. In terms of EoLC, participants sought timely access to care (84%) and being surrounded by loved ones (62%). Being at home was less of a priority (24%). Only 50% were familiar with Advance Care Planning (ACP). A lack of standard procedures as well as of support for the execution of plans and the ability to revisit those plans hindered uptake. The taboo around death conversations, the lack of opportunities and skills to initiate discussion, and personal fear and discomfort inhibited talking about death and dying. 72% felt that we do not talk enough about death and dying and advocated normalising talking by demystifying death with a positive approach. Health professionals could initiate and support this conversation, but this depended on communication skills and manageable workload pressure. Participants encouraged a public health approach and endorsed the use of: a) social media and other public platforms, b) formal education, c) formal and legal actions, and d) signposting and access to information.

conclusionsPeople are ready to talk about death and dying and COVID-19 has increased awareness. A combination of top-down and bottom-up initiatives across levels and settings can increase awareness, knowledge, and service-utilisation-drivers to support health professionals and people towards shared decisions which align with people's end of life wishes and preferences.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient PreferenceTerminal CareAdolescentAdultAdvance Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationCOVID-19FearFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCommunicationCultural issuesDeath and dyingEnd of Life CarePublic attitudesPublic healthQuality of lifeSupportive careTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID34284754
PMCPMC8290392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.