Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34284719›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Pre-capture multiplexing provides additional power to detect copy number variation in exome sequencing.

Dayne L Filer, Fengshen Kuo, Alicia T Brandt, Christian R Tilley, Piotr A Mieczkowski, Jonathan S Berg, Kimberly Robasky, Yun Li, Chris Bizon, Jeffery L Tilson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD): current and emerging technologies.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dayne L FilerDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA. dayne_filer@med.unc.edu.
Fengshen KuoRenaissance Computing Institute, Chapel Hill, USA.
Alicia T BrandtDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Christian R TilleyDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Piotr A MieczkowskiDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Jonathan S BergDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Kimberly RobaskyDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Yun LiDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Chris BizonRenaissance Computing Institute, Chapel Hill, USA.
Jeffery L TilsonRenaissance Computing Institute, Chapel Hill, USA.
Bradford C PowellDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Darius M BostDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Clark D JeffriesRenaissance Computing Institute, Chapel Hill, USA.
Kirk C WilhelmsenDepartment of Genetics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA.
Renaissance Computing Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

Expanding the utility of prenatal genetic testingF30HD101228 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FILER, DAYNE LEWIS · 2019 to 2022
$121k
NICHD NIH HHS F30 HD101228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs exome sequencing (ES) integrates into clinical practice, we should make every effort to utilize all information generated. Copy-number variation can lead to Mendelian disorders, but small copy-number variants (CNVs) often get overlooked or obscured by under-powered data collection. Many groups have developed methodology for detecting CNVs from ES, but existing methods often perform poorly for small CNVs and rely on large numbers of samples not always available to clinical laboratories. Furthermore, methods often rely on Bayesian approaches requiring user-defined priors in the setting of insufficient prior knowledge. This report first demonstrates the benefit of multiplexed exome capture (pooling samples prior to capture), then presents a novel detection algorithm, mcCNV ("multiplexed capture CNV"), built around multiplexed capture.

resultsWe demonstrate: (1) multiplexed capture reduces inter-sample variance; (2) our mcCNV method, a novel depth-based algorithm for detecting CNVs from multiplexed capture ES data, improves the detection of small CNVs. We contrast our novel approach, agnostic to prior information, with the the commonly-used ExomeDepth. In a simulation study mcCNV demonstrated a favorable false discovery rate (FDR). When compared to calls made from matched genome sequencing, we find the mcCNV algorithm performs comparably to ExomeDepth.

conclusionImplementing multiplexed capture increases power to detect single-exon CNVs. The novel mcCNV algorithm may provide a more favorable FDR than ExomeDepth. The greatest benefits of our approach derive from (1) not requiring a database of reference samples and (2) not requiring prior information about the prevalance or size of variants.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsExomeAlgorithmsBayes TheoremExome SequencingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingCaptureCopy number variationExome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34284719
PMCPMC8293537
OpenAlexW3186003996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.