ArticleBMC genomics2021
Multi-omics approach highlights differences between RLP classes in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Diversity, Predictive Protein Structures, and Interaction Networks of Cysteine-Rich Receptor-Like Kinases inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals significant loci and candidate genes for fruit branch length in upland cotton.The plant genome · 2025Article
- The resistance awakens: Diversity at the DNA, RNA, and protein levels informs engineering of plant immune receptors from Arabidopsis to crops.The Plant cell · 2025Review
- A splicing regulator, SR45, suppresses plant immunity by regulating salicylic acid pathway inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Coping with alpine habitats: genomic insights into the adaptation strategies ofHorticulture research · 2024Article
- Reactive oxygen species (ROS) modulate nitrogen signaling using temporal transcriptome analysis in foxtail millet.Plant molecular biology · 2024Article
- Laminarin-triggered defence responses are geographically dependent in natural populations of Solanum chilense.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Predicting Cloned Disease Resistance Gene Homologs (CDRHs) in Radish, Underutilised Oilseeds, and Wild Brassicaceae Species.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Concerted expansion and contraction of immune receptor gene repertoires in plant genomes.Nature plants · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of theGenes · 2022Article
- Identification of receptor-like proteins induced byFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Transcriptomics Reveals Fast Changes in Salicylate and Jasmonate Signaling Pathways in Shoots of Carbonate-TolerantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The Arabidopsis active demethylase ROS1eLife · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Leucine rich-repeat (LRR) receptor-like protein (RLP) family is a complex gene family with 57 members in Arabidopsis thaliana. Some members of the RLP family are known to be involved in basal developmental processes, whereas others are involved in defence responses. However, functional data is currently only available for a small subset of RLPs, leaving the remaining ones classified as RLPs of unknown function.
resultsUsing publicly available datasets, we annotated RLPs of unknown function as either likely defence-related or likely fulfilling a more basal function in plants. Then, using these categories, we can identify important characteristics that differ between the RLP subclasses. We found that the two classes differ in abundance on both transcriptome and proteome level, physical clustering in the genome and putative interaction partners. However, the classes do not differ in the genetic di versity of their individual members in accessible pan-genome data.
conclusionsOur work has several implications for work related to functional studies on RLPs as well as for the understanding of RLP gene family evolution. Using our annotations, we can make suggestions on which RLPs can be identified as potential immune receptors using genetics tools and thereby complement disease studies. The lack of differences in nucleotide diversity between the two RLP subclasses further suggests that non-synonymous diversity of gene sequences alone cannot distinguish defence from developmental genes. By contrast, differences in transcript and protein abundance or clustering at genomic loci might also allow for functional annotations and characterisation in other plant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.