Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34284564›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH2021

Efficacy of immunohistochemical staining in detecting <em>Helicobacter pylori</em> in Saudi patients with minimal and atypical infection.

Mohammed Akeel, Ahmed Elhafey, Atef Shehata, Erwa Elmakki, Thanaa Aboshouk, Hussein Ageely, Mohammed Salih Mahfouz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of histochemistry : EJH, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid and Efficient Screening ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Usefulness of Molecular Methods forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammed AkeelDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University. mohammed3keel@gmail.com.
Ahmed ElhafeyDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University. elhafeya@yahoo.com.
Atef ShehataDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University. mycology_atef@yahoo.com.
Erwa ElmakkiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University. erwamakki@gmail.com.
Thanaa AboshoukDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University. thanaa84@yahoo.com.
Hussein AgeelyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University. hageely@jazanu.edu.sa.
Mohammed Salih MahfouzDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University. mm.mahfouz@gmail.com.
Jazan University · SAYahoo (United Kingdom) · GBMohammed V University · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric Helicobacter pylori infection is diagnosed based on histopathological evaluation of gastric mucosal biopsies, urease test, urea breath test, H. pylori culturing, or direct detection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in detecting H. pylori in gastric biopsies from patients with chronic gastritis and minimal or atypical infection. Gastric biopsies from 50 patients with chronic gastritis were subjected to routine haematoxylin and eosin (H-E), modified Giemsa, and IHC staining. The results of staining were compared with those of quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The qRT-PCR analysis identified 32 (64%) H. pylori-positive cases, whereas IHC, H-E, and modified Giemsa staining identified 29 (58%), 27 (54%), and 21 (42%) positive cases. The sensitivity of IHC staining (87.50%) was higher than that of H-E (59.38%) and modified Giemsa (43.75%) staining. The specificity of H-E, modified Giemsa, and IHC staining was 55.56%, 61.11%, and 94.44%, respectively. IHC staining exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy (90%), followed by H-E (58%) and modified Giemsa (50%) staining. Active gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and lymphoid follicles were detected in 32 (64%), 4 (8%), and 22 (44%) cases, respectively, and all of these cases were H. pylori positive. In contrast to routine H-E and modified Giemsa staining, IHC allows for the accurate H. pylori detection in cases with minimal or atypical infection. Moreover, IHC can be an alternative diagnostic method to qRT-PCR for detection of H. pylori in such cases.

Indexed as

Gastric MucosaGastritisHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriImmunohistochemistrySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID34284564
PMCPMC8314390
OpenAlexW3129336731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.