Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34284563›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2021

Comparison of Long-Term Angiographic Results of Wide-Necked Intracranial Aneurysms : Endovascular Treatment with Single-Microcatheter Coiling, Double-Microcatheter Coiling, and Stent-Assisted Coiling.

Hyun Sik Kim, Byung Moon Cho, Chan Jong Yoo, Dae Han Choi, Dong Keun Hyun, Yu Shik Shim, Joon Ho Song, Jae Keun Oh, Jun Hyong Ahn, Ji Hee Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of Stent-Assisted and Non-Stent-Assisted coil embolization in the treatment of Wide-Neck intracranial aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun Sik KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Byung Moon ChoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Chan Jong YooDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Dae Han ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Dong Keun HyunDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Yu Shik ShimDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Joon Ho SongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Jae Keun OhDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Jun Hyong AhnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Ji Hee KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
In Bok ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRGachon University · KRInha University · KRKangdong Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is challenging in case of wide-necked aneurysms because coils are prone to herniate into the parent artery, causing thromboembolic events or vessel occlusion. This study aims to compare long-term angiographic results of wide-necked aneurysms treated by stent-assisted, double-microcatheter, or single-microcatheter groups.

methodsBetween January 2003 and October 2016, 108 aneurysms that were treated with endovascular coil embolization with a neck size wider than 4 mm and a follow-up period of more than 3 years were selected. We performed coil embolization with single-microcatheter, double-microcatheter, and stent-assisted techniques. Angiographic results were evaluated using the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC). All medical and angiographic records were reviewed retrospectively.

resultsClinical and angiographic analyses were conducted in 108 wide-necked aneurysms. The immediate post-procedural results revealed RROC class I (complete occlusion) in 66 cases (61.1%), class II (residual neck) in 36 cases (33.3%), and class III (residual sac) in six cases (5.6%). The final follow-up results revealed class I in 48 cases (44.4%), class II in 49 cases (45.4%), and class III in 11 cases (10.2%). Of a total of 45 (41.6%) radiologic recurrences, there were 21 cases (19.4%) of major recurrence that required additional treatment, and 24 cases (22.2%) of minor recurrence. The final follow-up angiographic results showed statistically significant differences between the stent-assisted group and the others (p<0.01).

conclusionLong-term follow-up angiography demonstrated that the stent-assisted technique had a better complete occlusion rate than the other two techniques.

Indexed as

EmbolizationEndovascular proceduresIntracranial aneurysm, wide neckedStent-assisted coiling

Identifiers

PMID34284563
PMCPMC8435641
OpenAlexW3183858271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.