ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2021
Artificial hyperventilation normalizes haemodynamics and arterial oxygen content in hypoxic rats.
Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxygenation Performance of Different Non-Invasive Devices for Treatment of Decompression Illness and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough humans are capable of enduring critically low levels of oxygen, many hypoxaemic patients die despite aggressive therapies. Mimicking the physiological hyperventilation necessary to survive extreme hypoxic conditions could minimize the derangements caused by acute hypoxic-hypoxia. The objective of this study was to measure the haemodynamic-biochemical response to artificially induced hyperventilation in hypoxic rats. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwenty-four deeply anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated rats were allocated to 3 groups: control (n = 5, FiO2 = 1); hypoxic spontaneously hyperventilating (n = 10, FiO2 = 0.08); and hypoxic artificially induced hyperventilation (n = 9, targeting PaCO2 = 10 mm Hg, FiO2 = 0.08). We compared the spontaneously and artificially hyperventilating groups. P-values < 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and serum chemistry were measured for 180 minutes.
resultsThe control group remained stable throughout the experiment. The hypoxic groups developed profound hypotension after the decrease in FiO2. However, the artificially induced hyperventilated rats recovered their MAP to levels higher than the spontaneously hyperventilating group (117.1 ± 17.2 vs. 68.1 ± 16.0, P = 0.0048). In regard to the biochemical derangements, even though the serum lactate and PaO2 were not different among the hypoxic groups, the artificially hyperventilated group achieved significantly higher SaO2 (94.3 ± 3.6 vs. 58.6 ± 9.6, P = 0.005), pH (7.87 ± 0.04 vs. 7.50 ± 0.13, P = 0.005), and CaO2 (17.7 ± 2.6 vs. 10.2 ± 1.3, P = 0.005) at 180 minutes.
conclusionsArtificially induced hyperventilation led to the correction of arterial oxygen content, severe serum chemistry, and haemodynamic derangements. These findings may represent a novel rescue manoeuvre and serve as a bridge to a permanent form of support, but should be further studied before being translated to the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.