Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34284553›Full record

Observational studyAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2021

Reproducibility of fluid status measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis in healthy volunteers: a key requirement to monitor fluid status in the intensive care unit.

Matthias Gijsen, Eline Simons, Pieter De Cock, Manu L N G Malbrain, Joost Wauters, Isabel Spriet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05572138 (Body Impedance Analysis to Detect Muscle Strength Associated With ICU Acquired Weakness), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05572138 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Body Impedance Analysis to Detect Muscle Strength Associated With ICU Acquired Weakness

TypeobservationalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2023 to 2024Enrolled62ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsBody Impedance Analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias GijsenDepartment of Pharmacy, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Eline SimonsDepartment of Pharmacy, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Pieter De CockDepartment of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Manu L N G MalbrainIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Jette, Belgium.
Joost WautersGeneral Internal Medicine/Medical Intensive Care Unit, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Isabel SprietDepartment of Pharmacy, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEGhent University · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLittle is known about the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of BIA measurements by comparing non-dominant versus dominant body-side measurements at 2 separate time points in healthy volunteers in order to extrapolate key elements that may be of relevance in critically ill patients. MATERIAL AND

methodsA prospective observational validation experiment was carried out in healthy volunteers. Full-body and segmental multiple frequency BIA measurements were carried out at the non-dominant and the dominant body side, consecutively, and on 2 separate occasions within 1 week. Parameters of interest were both raw data (impedance and phase angle) at the individual frequencies (5-50-100-200 kHz) and body fluid compartment volume estimations (total body water, extracellular water volume, intracellular water volume, volume excess).

resultsA total of 42 measurements were performed in 22 volunteers. Median (interquartile range) age and time between measurements was 26 years (24; 35) and 2.07 days (1.00; 2.99), respectively. The intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICCs) for body fluid compartment volumes estimated by full-body BIA, were greatly above 90%, showing excellent agreement, except for volume excess which showed moderate agreement. Full-body raw impedance and phase angle measurements showed highly variable and much lower ICCs. For both estimated body fluid compartment volumes and raw measurements, segmental BIA showed also highly variable and low ICCs.

conclusionsOverall this study showed that in healthy volunteers, BIA-derived fluid parameters are reproducible, and differences can be attributed to the changes in clinical status.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsAdultElectric ImpedanceHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicReproducibility of ResultsBIAbioelectrical impedance analysisextracellular waterfull-body.impedanceintracellular waterphase anglereactanceresistancetotal body water

Identifiers

PMID34284553
PMCPMC10165337
OpenAlexW3173847464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.