Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283930›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2021

Museum genomics reveals the Xerces blue butterfly (

Felix Grewe, Marcus R Kronforst, Naomi E Pierce, Corrie S Moreau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Felix GreweGrainger Bioinformatics Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
Marcus R KronforstDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Naomi E PierceDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Corrie S MoreauDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Cornell University · USField Museum of Natural History · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Characterizing the Molecular Basis of Supergene Mimicry in ButterfliesR35GM131828 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Marcus Kronforst · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last Xerces blue butterfly was seen in the early 1940s, and its extinction is credited to human urban development. This butterfly has become a North American icon for insect conservation, but some have questioned whether it was truly a distinct species, or simply an isolated population of another living species. To address this question, we leveraged next-generation sequencing using a 93-year-old museum specimen. We applied a genome skimming strategy that aimed for the organellar genome and high-copy fractions of the nuclear genome by a shallow sequencing approach. From these data, we were able to recover over 200 million nucleotides, which assembled into several phylogenetically informative markers and the near-complete mitochondrial genome. From our phylogenetic analyses and haplotype network analysis we conclude that the Xerces blue butterfly was a distinct species driven to extinction.

Indexed as

ButterfliesExtinction, BiologicalGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsGenomicsMuseumsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAancient DNA sequencingconservationextinctionLepidopteraLycaenidaemuseomics

Identifiers

PMID34283930
PMCPMC8292013
OpenAlexW3184702563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.