Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283858›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Toxoplasmosis infection among pregnant women in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tamirat Tesfaye Dasa, Teshome Gensa Geta, Ayalnesh Zemene Yalew, Rahel Mezemir Abebe, Henna Umer Kele

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Routine antenatal toxoplasmosis screening, is it necessary?Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. First Molecular Detection and Genotype Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamirat Tesfaye DasaHawassa University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-5057
Teshome Gensa GetaDepartment of Biomedical Science, Wolikite University, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolikite, Ethiopia.
Ayalnesh Zemene YalewSaint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Rahel Mezemir AbebeSaint Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Henna Umer KeleMalawi University, College of Medicine, Zomba, Malawi.
St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College · ETHawassa University · ETUniversity of Malawi · MWWolkite University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemiology of toxoplasmosis in pregnancy is a major issue in public health. Toxoplasmosis is caused by the protozoan parasite. Toxoplasma parasite is at high risk for life-threatening diseases during pregnancy. Congenital toxoplasmosis results from a maternal infection acquired during gestation. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to determine the seropositive prevalence of toxoplasmosis infection among pregnant women who attended antenatal care in a health facility in Africa. A systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished studies were included. Databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, African Journals Online were used with relevant search terms. The quality of the articles was critically evaluated using the tool of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were extracted on Microsoft word 2016. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 14 software. The heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I2 statistics and Egger's test, respectively. Forest plots were used to present the pooled prevalence and odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval of meta-analysis using the random effect model. In total, 23 studies comprising 7,579 pregnant women across ten countries in Africa were included in this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of seropositive toxoplasmosis among pregnant women in Africa was 51.01% (95% CI; 37.66, 64.34). The heterogeneity test showed that heterogeneity was high, I2 = 99.6%, P-value < 0.001. The variables responsible for the source of heterogeneity were included from Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Ethiopia. Overall prevalence of toxoplasmosis in Africa showed that more than one-half of pregnant women were infected. The risk of acquiring toxoplasmosis infection during pregnancy is high; hence, preventive measures to avoid exposure of pregnant women to Toxoplasma infection should be strictly applied.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleAdultCameroonCongoEthiopiaFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34283858
PMCPMC8291666
OpenAlexW3186101596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.