Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283853›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Seroprevalence of brucellosis and Q fever infections amongst pastoralists and their cattle herds in Sokoto State, Nigeria.

Simeon Cadmus, Samson Polycarp Salam, Hezekiah Kehinde Adesokan, Kelechi Akporube, Fiyinfoluwa Ola-Daniel, Emmanuel Jolaoluwa Awosanya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Seroprevalence ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Serosurvey ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Distribution and Prevalence ofInfectious disease reports · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simeon CadmusDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3281-2316
Samson Polycarp SalamNigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Abuja, Nigeria.
Hezekiah Kehinde AdesokanDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Kelechi AkporubeDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Fiyinfoluwa Ola-DanielDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Jolaoluwa AwosanyaDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
University of Ibadan · NGAfrican Field Epidemiology Network · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis and Q fever are neglected zoonoses of global health importance, with unknown true prevalence in occupationally vulnerable settings, partly due to misdiagnosis for other febrile conditions and poor access to primary health care. We examined the seroprevalence of these diseases and associated factors amongst pastoralists and their cattle in Sokoto State, a hub of cattle and pastoral populations in Nigeria. Serum samples randomly collected from 137 pastoralists and 366 cattle from 27 herds in three selected Local Government Areas (LGAs) in the state were analysed for antibodies to Brucella abortus using Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBT) and competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (cELISA) as well as antibodies to Coxiella burnetti using indirect ELISA. Consenting pastoralists' knowledge, perception and practices about the diseases were assessed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis at p ≤ 0.05 level of significance. Brucellosis adjusted individual seroprevalence were 0.83% (95%CI: 0.04-4.59%) and 0% among pastoralists; 2.28% (95%CI: 1.16-4.43%) and 5.70% (95%CI: 3.68-8.74%) in cattle by RBT and cELISA, respectively. Adjusted herd-level seroprevalence for brucellosis were 23.20% (95%CI: 11.07-42.54%) and 42.00% (95%CI: 25.27-61.11%) by RBT and cELISA, respectively. For Q fever, higher seroprevalence of 62.57% (95%CI: 54.04-70.46%) and 2.98% (95%CI: 1.57-5.58%) were recorded amongst the pastoralists and their cattle, respectively. with adjusted herd-level seroprevalence of 40.36% (95%CI: 22.57-63.17%). The LGAs of sampling were significantly (OR: 0.2; 95%CI: 0.02-1.00) associated with Q fever infection, though marginal. The majority of the pastoralists had poor knowledge, perception and practices towards the diseases. This is the first study establishing the presence of brucellosis and Q fever at the human-animal interface in Sokoto State, Nigeria. The pastoralists' poor knowledge, perception and practices about these diseases are worrisome and are important factors for consideration in disease control.

Indexed as

Seroepidemiologic StudiesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBrucella abortusBrucellosisCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGoatsHumansNigeriaQ FeverRisk FactorsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34283853
PMCPMC8291711
OpenAlexW3186508963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.