Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283830›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Genome-wide SNP analysis to assess the genetic population structure and diversity of Acrocomia species.

Brenda Gabriela Díaz, Maria Imaculada Zucchi, Alessandro Alves-Pereira, Caléo Panhoca de Almeida, Aline Costa Lima Moraes, Suelen Alves Vianna, Joaquim Azevedo-Filho, Carlos Augusto Colombo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phenotypic and Genotypic Variation of CultivatedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Production of Protein Concentrates from Macauba (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brenda Gabriela DíazBiology Institute, University of Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas-SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7787-8522
Maria Imaculada ZucchiBiology Institute, University of Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Alessandro Alves-PereiraBiology Institute, University of Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Caléo Panhoca de AlmeidaCentro de Pesquisa de Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Instituto Agronômico-IAC, Campinas-SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2416-219X
Aline Costa Lima MoraesBiology Institute, University of Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Suelen Alves ViannaCentro de Pesquisa de Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Instituto Agronômico-IAC, Campinas-SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5426-9342
Joaquim Azevedo-FilhoCentro de Pesquisa de Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Instituto Agronômico-IAC, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Carlos Augusto ColomboCentro de Pesquisa de Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Instituto Agronômico-IAC, Campinas-SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acrocomia (Arecaceae) is a genus widely distributed in tropical and subtropical America that has been achieving economic interest due to the great potential of oil production of some of its species. In particular A. aculeata, due to its vocation to supply oil with the same productive capacity as the oil palm (Elaeis guineenses) even in areas with water deficit. Although eight species are recognized in the genus, the taxonomic classification based on morphology and geographic distribution is still controversial. Knowledge about the genetic diversity and population structure of the species is limited, which has limited the understanding of the genetic relationships and the orientation of management, conservation, and genetic improvement activities of species of the genus. In the present study, we analyzed the genomic diversity and population structure of Acrocomia genus, including 172 samples from seven species, with a focus on A. aculeata with 117 samples covering a wide geographical area of occurrence of the species, using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers originated from Genotyping By Sequencing (GBS).The genetic structure of the Acrocomia species were partially congruent with the current taxonomic classification based on morphological characters, recovering the separation of the species A. aculeata, A. totai, A. crispa and A. intumescens as distinct taxonomic groups. However, the species A. media was attributed to the cluster of A. aculeata while A. hassleri and A. glauscescens were grouped together with A. totai. The species that showed the highest and lowest genetic diversity were A. totai and A. media, respectively. When analyzed separately, the species A. aculeata showed a strong genetic structure, forming two genetic groups, the first represented mainly by genotypes from Brazil and the second by accessions from Central and North American countries. Greater genetic diversity was found in Brazil when compared to the other countries. Our results on the genetic diversity of the genus are unprecedented, as is also establishes new insights on the genomic relationships between Acrocomia species. It is also the first study to provide a more global view of the genomic diversity of A. aculeata. We also highlight the applicability of genomic data as a reference for future studies on genetic diversity, taxonomy, evolution and phylogeny of the Acrocomia genus, as well as to support strategies for the conservation, exploration and breeding of Acrocomia species and in particular A. aculeata.

Indexed as

ArecaceaePhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, Plant

Identifiers

PMID34283830
PMCPMC8291712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.