ArticleScience progress
An optimal non-viral gene transfer method for genetically modifying porcine bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for experimental therapeutics.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No currently available treatment is able to generate new contractile tissue or significantly improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although gene transfer-enhanced endothelial progenitor cells (GTE-EPCs) show effectiveness in MI treatment in small animal models, no clinical trials using GTE-EPCs have been documented. Before the introduction of GTE-EPCs into human trials, gene-transfer-mediated augmentation of EPC function in animal models that reflect the human MI scenario should be tested. In this regard, a porcine model is the best choice since pigs have cardiac size, hemodynamics and coronary anatomy similar to that of humans. To examine GTE-EPC therapeutic efficacy in pig MI models, an efficient method for gene transfer into pig EPCs is required, which however, has been poorly documented. Pig bone marrow mononuclear cells were isolated and cultured in EGM-2 medium to obtain bone marrow-derived EPCs (BM-EPCs) that were characterized by immunostaining and the tube formation assay. Gene transfer was optimized in 6-well plates using a GFP and a VEGF plasmid, and scaled up in T75 flasks. Gene transfer efficiency was determined by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. VEGF levels were measured by ELISA. Cell proliferation was assayed by the CCK-8 kit. (1) BM-EPCs expressed VEGFR2 and eNOS but not CD45 protein, and formed tube structures on Matrigel; (2) several chemical compounds were explored with the highest transfection efficiency of 41.4% ± 5.8% achieved using Lipofectamine 3000; (3) the VEGF level in culture medium after VEGF transfection was 378 ± 48 ng/10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.