Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283167›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Caries and Restoration Detection Using Bitewing Film Based on Transfer Learning with CNNs.

Yi-Cheng Mao, Tsung-Yi Chen, He-Sheng Chou, Szu-Yin Lin, Sheng-Yu Liu, Yu-An Chen, Yu-Lin Liu, Chiung-An Chen, Yen-Cheng Huang, Shih-Lun Chen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi-Cheng MaoDepartment of General Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan.
Tsung-Yi ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan.
He-Sheng ChouDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan.
Szu-Yin LinDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Ilan University, Yilan City 26047, Taiwan.
Sheng-Yu LiuDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan.
Yu-An ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan.
Yu-Lin LiuDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan.
Chiung-An ChenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 243303, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7605-5214
Yen-Cheng HuangDepartment of General Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan.
Shih-Lun ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan City 32023, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4079-9350
Chun-Wei LiDepartment of General Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan.
Patricia Angela R AbuDepartment of Information Systems and Computer Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City 1108, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-8848-6644
Wei-Yuan ChiangNational Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu City 30076, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5158-0031
Chung Yuan Christian University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWAteneo de Manila University · PHMing Chi University of Technology · TWNational Ilan University · TWNational Synchrotron Radiation Research Center · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-106-2119-M-033-001Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-106-2221-E-033-072Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-106-2622-E-033-014-CC2Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 107-2112-M-131-001Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-107-2218-E-131-002Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-107-2221-E-033-057Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-107-2622-E-131-007-CC3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-109-2410-H-197-002-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caries is a dental disease caused by bacterial infection. If the cause of the caries is detected early, the treatment will be relatively easy, which in turn prevents caries from spreading. The current common procedure of dentists is to first perform radiographic examination on the patient and mark the lesions manually. However, the work of judging lesions and markings requires professional experience and is very time-consuming and repetitive. Taking advantage of the rapid development of artificial intelligence imaging research and technical methods will help dentists make accurate markings and improve medical treatments. It can also shorten the judgment time of professionals. In addition to the use of Gaussian high-pass filter and Otsu's threshold image enhancement technology, this research solves the problem that the original cutting technology cannot extract certain single teeth, and it proposes a caries and lesions area analysis model based on convolutional neural networks (CNN), which can identify caries and restorations from the bitewing images. Moreover, it provides dentists with more accurate objective judgment data to achieve the purpose of automatic diagnosis and treatment planning as a technology for assisting precision medicine. A standardized database established following a defined set of steps is also proposed in this study. There are three main steps to generate the image of a single tooth from a bitewing image, which can increase the accuracy of the analysis model. The steps include (1) preprocessing of the dental image to obtain a high-quality binarization, (2) a dental image cropping procedure to obtain individually separated tooth samples, and (3) a dental image masking step which masks the fine broken teeth from the sample and enhances the quality of the training. Among the current four common neural networks, namely, AlexNet, GoogleNet, Vgg19, and ResNet50, experimental results show that the proposed AlexNet model in this study for restoration and caries judgments has an accuracy as high as 95.56% and 90.30%, respectively. These are promising results that lead to the possibility of developing an automatic judgment method of bitewing film.

Indexed as

Dental CariesToothArtificial IntelligenceDental Caries SusceptibilityHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlexNetbiomedical imagebitewing filmCNNdeep learningGaussian high-pass filterOtsu’s thresholdingtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34283167
PMCPMC8272123
OpenAlexW3182861325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.