Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283153›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Automated Landslide-Risk Prediction Using Web GIS and Machine Learning Models.

Naruephorn Tengtrairat, Wai Lok Woo, Phetcharat Parathai, Chuchoke Aryupong, Peerapong Jitsangiam, Damrongsak Rinchumphu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naruephorn TengtrairatSchool of Software Engineering, Payap University, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand.
Wai Lok WooDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-7605
Phetcharat ParathaiSchool of Software Engineering, Payap University, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand.
Chuchoke AryupongCenter of Excellence for Natural Disaster Management (CENDIM), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Peerapong JitsangiamCenter of Excellence for Natural Disaster Management (CENDIM), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7569-9173
Damrongsak RinchumphuCenter of Excellence for Natural Disaster Management (CENDIM), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-4974

Funding

Thailand Science Research and Innovation TSRI: No. 1565536; 2564A10402035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial susceptible landslide prediction is the one of the most challenging research areas which essentially concerns the safety of inhabitants. The novel geographic information web (GIW) application is proposed for dynamically predicting landslide risk in Chiang Rai, Thailand. The automated GIW system is coordinated between machine learning technologies, web technologies, and application programming interfaces (APIs). The new bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) algorithm is presented to forecast landslides. The proposed algorithm consists of 3 major steps, the first of which is the construction of a landslide dataset by using Quantum GIS (QGIS). The second step is to generate the landslide-risk model based on machine learning approaches. Finally, the automated landslide-risk visualization illustrates the likelihood of landslide via Google Maps on the website. Four static factors are considered for landslide-risk prediction, namely, land cover, soil properties, elevation and slope, and a single dynamic factor i.e., precipitation. Data are collected to construct a geospatial landslide database which comprises three historical landslide locations-Phu Chifa at Thoeng District, Ban Pha Duea at Mae Salong Nai, and Mai Salong Nok in Mae Fa Luang District, Chiang Rai, Thailand. Data collection is achieved using QGIS software to interpolate contour, elevation, slope degree and land cover from the Google satellite images, aerial and site survey photographs while the physiographic and rock type are on-site surveyed by experts. The state-of-the-art machine learning models have been trained i.e., linear regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), LSTM, and Bi-LSTM. Ablation studies have been conducted to determine the optimal parameters setting for each model. An enhancement method based on two-stage classifications has been presented to improve the landslide prediction of LSTM and Bi-LSTM models. The landslide-risk prediction performances of these models are subsequently evaluated using real-time dataset and it is shown that Bi-LSTM with Random Forest (Bi-LSTM-RF) yields the best prediction performance. Bi-LSTM-RF model has improved the landslide-risk predicting performance over LR, ANNs, LSTM, and Bi-LSTM in terms of the area under the receiver characteristic operator (AUC) scores by 0.42, 0.27, 0.46, and 0.47, respectively. Finally, an automated web GIS has been developed and it consists of software components including the trained models, rainfall API, Google API, and geodatabase. All components have been interfaced together via JavaScript and Node.js tool.

Indexed as

LandslidesGeographic Information SystemsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerThailandartificial intelligencegeographic information systemgoogle maplandslide risk predictionlinear regressionlong short-term memorymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34283153
PMCPMC8271927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.