Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283107›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Optimization of X-ray Investigations in Dentistry Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Ralph-Alexandru Erdelyi, Virgil-Florin Duma, Cosmin Sinescu, George Mihai Dobre, Adrian Bradu, Adrian Podoleanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ralph-Alexandru ErdelyiDoctoral School, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, 1 Mihai Viteazu Ave., 300222 Timisoara, Romania.
Virgil-Florin DumaDoctoral School, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, 1 Mihai Viteazu Ave., 300222 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-4777
Cosmin SinescuResearch Center in Dental Medicine Using Conventional and Alternative Technologies, School of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5651-7215
George Mihai DobreApplied Optics Group, School of Physics, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK.
Adrian BraduApplied Optics Group, School of Physics, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6890-1599
Adrian PodoleanuApplied Optics Group, School of Physics, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4899-9656

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S0166431/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Rebot EP/N019229/1European Research Council 249889Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI-UEFISCDI PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-2600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common imaging technique for dental diagnoses and treatment monitoring is X-ray imaging, which evolved from the first intraoral radiographs to high-quality three-dimensional (3D) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Other imaging techniques have shown potential, such as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). We have recently reported on the boundaries of these two types of techniques, regarding. the dental fields where each one is more appropriate or where they should be both used. The aim of the present study is to explore the unique capabilities of the OCT technique to optimize X-ray units imaging (i.e., in terms of image resolution, radiation dose, or contrast). Two types of commercially available and widely used X-ray units are considered. To adjust their parameters, a protocol is developed to employ OCT images of dental conditions that are documented on high (i.e., less than 10 μm) resolution OCT images (both B-scans/cross sections and 3D reconstructions) but are hardly identified on the 200 to 75 μm resolution panoramic or CBCT radiographs. The optimized calibration of the X-ray unit includes choosing appropriate values for the anode voltage and current intensity of the X-ray tube, as well as the patient's positioning, in order to reach the highest possible X-rays resolution at a radiation dose that is safe for the patient. The optimization protocol is developed in vitro on OCT images of extracted teeth and is further applied in vivo for each type of dental investigation. Optimized radiographic results are compared with un-optimized previously performed radiographs. Also, we show that OCT can permit a rigorous comparison between two (types of) X-ray units. In conclusion, high-quality dental images are possible using low radiation doses if an optimized protocol, developed using OCT, is applied for each type of dental investigation. Also, there are situations when the X-ray technology has drawbacks for dental diagnosis or treatment assessment. In such situations, OCT proves capable to provide qualitative images.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyTomography, Optical CoherenceDentistryHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, ImagingX-Raysdental imagingimage characteristicsOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)radiation doseradiographythree-dimensional (3D) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

Identifiers

PMID34283107
PMCPMC8271642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.