Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34283001›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Early approval of COVID-19 vaccines: Pros and cons.

Md Arifur Rahman, Md Sayeedul Islam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Tracking the COVID-19 vaccines: The global landscape.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Post-genomic platform for development of oligonucleotide vaccines against RNA viruses: diamond cuts diamond.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Pill versus vaccine for COVID-19: Is there a genuine dilemma?Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mind the "Vaccine Fatigue".Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Md Arifur RahmanDepartment of Microbiology, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5616-1650
Md Sayeedul IslamDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of safe and effective vaccines has been an overriding priority for controlling the 2019-coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. From the onset, COVID-19 has caused high mortality and economic losses and yet has also offered an opportunity to advance novel therapeutics such as DNA and mRNA vaccines. Although it is hoped that the swift acceptance of such vaccines will prevent loss of life, rejuvenate economies and restore normal life, there could also be significant pitfalls. This perspective provides an overview of future directions and challenges in advancing promising vaccine platforms to widespread therapeutic use.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19DNAmRNASARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34283001
PMCPMC8437465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.