Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282791›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Neuroblastoma Molecular Risk-Stratification of DNA Copy Number and

Smadar Kahana-Edwin, Lucy E Cain, Geoffrey McCowage, Artur Darmanian, Dale Wright, Anna Mullins, Federica Saletta, Jonathan Karpelowsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sequential Analysis of cfDNA Reveals Clonal Evolution in Patients with Neuroblastoma Receiving ALK-Targeted Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent clinical research on the application of liquid biopsy in neuroblastoma.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Circulating Tumor DNA in Pediatric Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Smadar Kahana-EdwinAdvanced Molecular Diagnostics, Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2869-4310
Lucy E CainCancer Centre for Children, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Geoffrey McCowageCancer Centre for Children, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Artur DarmanianCytogenetics Department, Sydney Genome Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Dale WrightCytogenetics Department, Sydney Genome Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Anna MullinsCancer Centre for Children, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Federica SalettaAdvanced Molecular Diagnostics, Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-3504
Jonathan KarpelowskyAdvanced Molecular Diagnostics, Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Children's Hospital at Westmead · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Kids Cancer Alliance 109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsVarious pre-analytical conditions tested to optimize circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) copy number changes evaluations. Plasma samples from 10 patients diagnosed with neuroblastoma assessed for SCA and MNA using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array approach currently used for neuroblastoma diagnosis, with MNA status assessed independently using digital-droplet PCR (ddPCR). Three patients (one in common with the previous 10) tested for

resultsCopy number detection is highly affected by physical perturbations of the blood sample (mimicking suboptimal sample shipment), which could be overcome using specialized preservative collection tubes. Pre-analytical DNA repair procedures on ctDNA before SNP chromosome microarray processing improved the lower limit of detection for SCA and MNA, defined as 20% and 10%, respectively. We detected SCA in 10/10 (100%) patients using SNP array, 7 of which also presented MNA. Circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) and matched tumor DNA profiles were generally identical. MNA was detected using ddPCR in 7/7 (100%) of MNA and 0/12 (0%) non-MNA cases. MNA and

conclusionsThese results demonstrate the feasibility of ctDNA profiling for molecular risk-stratification, and treatment monitoring in a clinically relevant time frame and the potential to reduce fresh tissue requirements currently embedded in the management of neuroblastoma.

Indexed as

ALK variantsctDNAneuroblastomapre-analyticalrisk-stratificationtreatment monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34282791
PMCPMC8267662
OpenAlexW3178559465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.