Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282764›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Impact of Surgical Resection and Reasons for Poor Prognosis of Pelvic Osteosarcoma Based on the Bone Tumor Registry in Japan.

Satoshi Takenaka, Hironari Tamiya, Toru Wakamatsu, Sho Nakai, Yoshinori Imura, Hidetatsu Outani, Toshinari Yagi, Akira Kawai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi TakenakaMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Hironari TamiyaMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Toru WakamatsuMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Sho NakaiMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Yoshinori ImuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Hidetatsu OutaniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Toshinari YagiMusculoskeletal Oncology Service, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Akira KawaiMusculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K21470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic osteosarcoma has a poor prognosis compared to osteosarcomas in other locations, and the reasons for this remain unknown. Surgical resection of pelvic osteosarcoma is technically demanding and often results in dysfunction and complications. In this study, we investigated the reasons underlying the poor prognosis of pelvic osteosarcoma by comparing it to femoral osteosarcoma using data from the Bone Tumor Registry in Japan. We used propensity score analysis to determine whether surgical resection of pelvic osteosarcoma improved its prognosis. We demonstrated that pelvic osteosarcoma had a poor prognosis because it occurred more often in the elderly, often had larger tumor size, and had metastasis at presentation more often in comparison to femoral osteosarcoma. These three factors were also associated with the non-surgical treatment of pelvic osteosarcoma, which also led to a poor outcome. The overall survival rate was only comparable in pelvic osteosarcoma and femoral osteosarcoma in cases treated with surgical resection. Propensity score analysis revealed that surgical treatment improved the prognosis of pelvic osteosarcoma. As such, we propose that surgical resection should be considered based on tumor stage and patient age in order to improve the prognosis of pelvic osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

pelvic osteosarcomaprognosispropensity scoresurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID34282764
PMCPMC8268378
OpenAlexW3173150527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.