ReviewCancers2021
Genomics of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Time for Clinical Translation of Findings?
Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monoclonal gammopathy of increasing significance: time to screen?Haematologica · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic disorder of clonal bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PCs) in between the premalignant condition known as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and overt multiple myeloma (MM). It is characterized by a deep biological heterogeneity that is reflected in a markedly variable progression risk among patients. Recently proposed risk stratification models mainly rely on indirect markers of disease burden and are unable to identify cases in whom clonal PCs have already undergone the "malignant switch" but major clonal expansion has not occurred yet. In the last years, the application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques has led to profound advances in the understanding of the molecular bases of SMM progression, and in all likelihood, it will contribute to the needed improvement of SMM prognostication. In this Review, we describe the recent advances in characterizing the genomic landscape of SMM and intrinsic determinants of its progression, highlighting their implications in terms of understanding of tumor evolution and prognostication. We also review the main studies investigating the role of the microenvironment in this early disease stage. Finally, we mention the results of the first randomized clinical trials and discuss the potential clinical translability of the genomic insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.