Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282758›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Reversible Low Frequency Alternating Current Nerve Conduction Block Applied to Mammalian Autonomic Nerves.

M Ivette Muzquiz, Landan Mintch, M Ryne Horn, Awadh Alhawwash, Rizwan Bashirullah, Michael Carr, John H Schild, Ken Yoshida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M Ivette MuzquizDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8657-6101
Landan MintchRipple LLC, Salt Lake City, UT 84106, USA.
M Ryne HornDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1066-6303
Awadh AlhawwashWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0044-5416
Rizwan BashirullahGalvani Bioelectronics Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.
Michael CarrGalvani Bioelectronics Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.
John H SchildDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Ken YoshidaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4566-580X
University of Indianapolis · USBioElectronics (United States) · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USRipple (United States) · US

Funding

Reversible block of nerve conduction using low frequency alternating currentsR21EB028469 · NIBIB · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI YOSHIDA, KEN · 2019 to 2021
$630k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB028469NIH HHS R21EB0284969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation can be used to modulate activity within the nervous system in one of two modes: (1) Activation, where activity is added to the neural signalling pathways, or (2) Block, where activity in the nerve is reduced or eliminated. In principle, electrical nerve conduction block has many attractive properties compared to pharmaceutical or surgical interventions. These include reversibility, localization, and tunability for nerve caliber and type. However, methods to effect electrical nerve block are relatively new. Some methods can have associated drawbacks, such as the need for large currents, the production of irreversible chemical byproducts, and onset responses. These can lead to irreversible nerve damage or undesirable neural responses. In the present study we describe a novel low frequency alternating current blocking waveform (LFACb) and measure its efficacy to reversibly block the bradycardic effect elicited by vagal stimulation in anaesthetised rat model. The waveform is a sinusoidal, zero mean(charge balanced), current waveform presented at 1 Hz to bipolar electrodes. Standard pulse stimulation was delivered through Pt-Black coated PtIr bipolar hook electrodes to evoke bradycardia. The conditioning LFAC waveform was presented either through a set of CorTec

Indexed as

Nerve BlockNeural ConductionAnimalsAutonomic PathwaysElectric StimulationElectrodesRatslow frequency alternating current blocknerve conduction blockneuromodulationreversible nerve block

Identifiers

PMID34282758
PMCPMC8271881
OpenAlexW3175120867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.