Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282454›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Investigating pig survival in different production phases using genomic models.

Natália Galoro Leite, Egbert Frank Knol, André Luiz Seccatto Garcia, Marcos Soares Lopes, Louisa Zak, Shogo Tsuruta, Fabyano Fonseca E Silva, Daniela Lourenco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natália Galoro LeiteDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9327-426X
Egbert Frank KnolTopigs Norsvin Research Center, Beuningen, GE 6641 SZ, The Netherlands.
André Luiz Seccatto GarciaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9778-7978
Marcos Soares LopesTopigs Norsvin, Curitiba, PR 80420-210, Brazil.
Louisa ZakTopigs Norsvin Research Center, Beuningen, GE 6641 SZ, The Netherlands.
Shogo TsurutaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6897-6363
Fabyano Fonseca E SilvaDepartamnto de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG 36570-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9536-1113
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

Brazilian National Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pig survival is an economically important trait with relevant social welfare implications, thus standing out as an important selection criterion for the current pig farming system. We aimed to estimate (co)variance components for survival in different production phases in a crossbred pig population as well as to investigate the benefit of including genomic information through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) on the prediction accuracy of survival traits compared with results from traditional BLUP. Individual survival records on, at most, 64,894 crossbred piglets were evaluated under two multi-trait threshold models. The first model included farrowing, lactation, and combined postweaning survival, whereas the second model included nursery and finishing survival. Direct and maternal breeding values were estimated using BLUP and ssGBLUP methods. Furthermore, prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion were accessed using the linear regression validation method. Direct heritability estimates for survival in all studied phases were low (from 0.02 to 0.08). Survival in preweaning phases (farrowing and lactation) was controlled by the dam and piglet additive genetic effects, although the maternal side was more important. Postweaning phases (nursery, finishing, and the combination of both) showed the same or higher direct heritabilities compared with preweaning phases. The genetic correlations between survival traits within preweaning and postweaning phases were favorable and strong, but correlations between preweaning and postweaning phases were moderate. The prediction accuracy of survival traits was low, although it increased by including genomic information through ssGBLUP compared with the prediction accuracy from BLUP. Direct and maternal breeding values were similarly accurate with BLUP, but direct breeding values benefited more from genomic information. Overall, a slight increase in bias was observed when genomic information was included, whereas dispersion of breeding values was greatly reduced. Combined postweaning survival presented higher direct heritability than in the preweaning phases and the highest prediction accuracy among all evaluated production phases, therefore standing out as a candidate trait for improving survival. Survival is a complex trait with low heritability; however, important genetic gains can still be obtained, especially under a genomic prediction framework.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, GeneticAnimalsFemaleGenomicsGenotypePedigreePhenotypeSwinepig welfarepost-weaning mortalityprediction accuracypre-weaning mortality

Identifiers

PMID34282454
PMCPMC8404463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.