ArticleJournal of animal science2021
Investigating pig survival in different production phases using genomic models.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scaling linear-model breeding values to the liability scale: an application to pig binary traits.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Genetics of reproductive performance across Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) outbreak phases in purebred and crossbred sows.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Crated sow breeding values for mothering ability reduce piglet mortality in free farrowing pens.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Genetic evaluation of longevity in Australian Angus cattle using random regression models.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Genotyping both live and dead animals to improve post-weaning survival of pigs in breeding programs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Selection Signal Analysis Reveals Hainan Yellow Cattle Are Being Selectively Bred for Heat Tolerance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Reviewing the definition of mortality in broiler chickens and its implications in genomic evaluations.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- The impact of genotyping strategies and statistical models on accuracy of genomic prediction for survival in pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Effective Selection for Lower Mortality in Organic Pigs through Selection for Total Number Born and Number of Dead Piglets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genetic aspects of piglet survival and related traits: a review.Journal of animal science · 2022Review
- The Effect of Using Organic or Conventional Sires on Genetic Gain in Organic Pigs: A Simulation Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pig survival is an economically important trait with relevant social welfare implications, thus standing out as an important selection criterion for the current pig farming system. We aimed to estimate (co)variance components for survival in different production phases in a crossbred pig population as well as to investigate the benefit of including genomic information through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) on the prediction accuracy of survival traits compared with results from traditional BLUP. Individual survival records on, at most, 64,894 crossbred piglets were evaluated under two multi-trait threshold models. The first model included farrowing, lactation, and combined postweaning survival, whereas the second model included nursery and finishing survival. Direct and maternal breeding values were estimated using BLUP and ssGBLUP methods. Furthermore, prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion were accessed using the linear regression validation method. Direct heritability estimates for survival in all studied phases were low (from 0.02 to 0.08). Survival in preweaning phases (farrowing and lactation) was controlled by the dam and piglet additive genetic effects, although the maternal side was more important. Postweaning phases (nursery, finishing, and the combination of both) showed the same or higher direct heritabilities compared with preweaning phases. The genetic correlations between survival traits within preweaning and postweaning phases were favorable and strong, but correlations between preweaning and postweaning phases were moderate. The prediction accuracy of survival traits was low, although it increased by including genomic information through ssGBLUP compared with the prediction accuracy from BLUP. Direct and maternal breeding values were similarly accurate with BLUP, but direct breeding values benefited more from genomic information. Overall, a slight increase in bias was observed when genomic information was included, whereas dispersion of breeding values was greatly reduced. Combined postweaning survival presented higher direct heritability than in the preweaning phases and the highest prediction accuracy among all evaluated production phases, therefore standing out as a candidate trait for improving survival. Survival is a complex trait with low heritability; however, important genetic gains can still be obtained, especially under a genomic prediction framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.