Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282406›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Remdesivir Versus Standard-of-Care for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: An Analysis of 28-Day Mortality.

Susan A Olender, Theresa L Walunas, Esteban Martinez, Katherine K Perez, Antonella Castagna, Su Wang, Dax Kurbegov, Parag Goyal, Diego Ripamonti, Bindu Balani and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Susan A OlenderDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Theresa L WalunasNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Illinois, Chicago, USA.
Esteban MartinezHospital Clínic-IDIBAPS and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Katherine K PerezDepartment of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
Antonella CastagnaVita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Su WangSaint Barnabas Medical Center, RWJBarnabas Health Medical Group, Livingston, New Jersey, USA.
Dax KurbegovSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Parag GoyalWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Diego RipamontiASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Bindu BalaniHackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA.
Francesco G De RosaDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Stéphane De WitNEAT ID Foundation, CHU Saint Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Shin-Woo KimKyungpook National University Hospital, Republic of Korea.
George DiazProvidence Regional Medical Center Everett, Everett, Washington, USA.
Raffaele BrunoFondazione IRCCS S. Matteo Hospital - University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Kathleen M MullaneUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David Chien LyeNational Centre for Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Robert L GottliebBaylor University Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-8709
Richard H HaubrichGilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Anand P ChokkalingamGilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
George WuGilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Helena Diaz-CuervoGilead Sciences, S.L., Madrid, Spain.
Diana M BrainardGilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
I-Heng LeeGilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Hao HuGilead Sciences, Ltd, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong.
Lanjia LinGilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Anu O OsinusiGilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Jose I BernardinoHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ) Madrid, Spain.
Marta BoffitoChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USAzienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti · ITBaylor University Medical Center · USChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USCornell University · USGilead Sciences (Spain) · ESHackensack University Medical Center · USHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital La Paz Institute for Health Research · ESHouston Methodist · USKyungpook National University Hospital · KRNorthwestern University · USOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITProvidence Regional Medical Center Everett · USSaint Barnabas Medical Center · USSarah Cannon · USTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemdesivir is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been shown to shorten time to recovery and improve clinical outcomes in randomized trials.

methodsThis was the final day 28 comparative analysis of data from a phase 3, randomized, open-label study comparing 2 remdesivir regimens (5 vs 10 days, combined for this analysis [remdesivir cohort]) and a real-world retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (nonremdesivir cohort). Eligible patients, aged ≥18 years, had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score matching (up to 1:10 ratio) was used to ensure comparable populations. We assessed day 14 clinical recovery (determined using a 7-point ordinal scale) and day 28 all-cause mortality (coprimary endpoints).

resultsA total of 368 (remdesivir) and 1399 (nonremdesivir) patients were included in the matched analysis. The day 14 clinical recovery rate was significantly higher among the remdesivir versus the nonremdesivir cohort (65.2% vs 57.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.90;

conclusionsRemdesivir was associated with significantly higher rates of day 14 clinical recovery, and lower day 28 mortality, compared with standard-of-care treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These data, taken together, support the use of remdesivir to improve clinical recovery and decrease mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19mortalityremdesivirSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34282406
PMCPMC8244650
OpenAlexW3165008380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.