Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282261›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021

Maternal nativity and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes among Black women residing in California, 2011-2017.

Safyer McKenzie-Sampson, Rebecca J Baer, Bridgette E Blebu, Deborah Karasek, Scott P Oltman, Matthew S Pantell, Larry Rand, Elizabeth E Rogers, Jacqueline M Torres, Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes among U.S. and African-born Black women in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Safyer McKenzie-SampsonDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. safyer.mckenzie-sampson@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3924-9634
Rebecca J BaerUCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bridgette E BlebuUCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Deborah KarasekUCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Scott P OltmanDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Matthew S PantellDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-5553
Larry RandUCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elizabeth E RogersUCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jacqueline M TorresDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Laura L Jelliffe-PawlowskiDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Karen A ScottUCSF California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brittany D ChambersDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

UCSF/Kaiser-DOR Program for Developing Independent Women's Health ResearchersK12HD052163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER, NANCY E, BRINDIS, CLAIRE D. · 2005 to 2023
$9.3M
Transdisciplinary Research Training to Reduce Disparities in Preterm Birth and Improve Maternal and Neonatal OutcomesT32HD098057 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KUPPERMANN, MIRIAM · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052163NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD098057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExamine the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes among the United States (US)-born and foreign-born Black women in California. STUDY

designThe study comprised all singleton live births to Black women in California between 2011 and 2017. We defined maternal nativity as US-born or foreign-born. Using Poisson regression, we computed risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for three adverse perinatal outcomes: preterm birth, small for gestational age deliveries, and infant mortality.

resultsRates of adverse perinatal outcomes were significantly higher among US-born Black women. In adjusted models, US-born Black women experienced an increased risk of preterm birth (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.39, 1.65) and small for gestational age deliveries (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.41, 1.64), compared to foreign-born Black women.

conclusionsFuture studies should consider experiences of racism across the life course when exploring heterogeneity in the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes by nativity among Black women in the US.

Indexed as

Premature BirthBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgePregnancyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34282261
PMCPMC8939260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.