Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282210›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Targeted metabolomics identifies high performing diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for COVID-19.

Yamilé López-Hernández, Joel Monárrez-Espino, Ana-Sofía Herrera-van Oostdam, Julio Enrique Castañeda Delgado, Lun Zhang, Jiamin Zheng, Juan José Oropeza Valdez, Rupasri Mandal, Fátima de Lourdes Ochoa González, Juan Carlos Borrego Moreno and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yamilé López-HernándezCátedras-CONACyT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, 03940, México, México. ylopezher@conacyt.mx.
Joel Monárrez-EspinoChristus Muguerza Hospital Chihuahua-University of Monterrey, 31000, Chihuahua, Mexico. jmonarrez@hotmail.com.
Ana-Sofía Herrera-van OostdamFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí, 78210, San Luis Potosi, Mexico.
Julio Enrique Castañeda DelgadoCátedras-CONACyT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, 03940, México, México.
Lun ZhangThe Metabolomics Innovation Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G1C9, Canada.
Jiamin ZhengThe Metabolomics Innovation Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G1C9, Canada.
Juan José Oropeza ValdezUnidad de Investigación Biomédica de Zacatecas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 98000, Zacatecas, México.
Rupasri MandalThe Metabolomics Innovation Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G1C9, Canada.
Fátima de Lourdes Ochoa GonzálezUnidad de Investigación Biomédica de Zacatecas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 98000, Zacatecas, México.
Juan Carlos Borrego MorenoDepartmento de Epidemiología, Hospital General de Zona #1 "Emilio Varela Luján", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 98000, Zacatecas, México.
Flor M Trejo-MedinillaAutonomous University of Zacatecas, 98000, Zacatecas, Mexico.
Jesús Adrián LópezMicroRNAs Laboratory, Academic Unit for Biological Sciences, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, 98000, Zacatecas, Mexico.
José Antonio Enciso MorenoUnidad de Investigación Biomédica de Zacatecas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 98000, Zacatecas, México.
David S WishartThe Metabolomics Innovation Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G1C9, Canada.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 311880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research exploring the development and outcome of COVID-19 infections has led to the need to find better diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This cross-sectional study used targeted metabolomics to identify potential COVID-19 biomarkers that predicted the course of the illness by assessing 110 endogenous plasma metabolites from individuals admitted to a local hospital for diagnosis/treatment. Patients were classified into four groups (≈ 40 each) according to standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) COVID-19 testing and disease course: PCR-/controls (i.e., non-COVID controls), PCR+/not-hospitalized, PCR+/hospitalized, and PCR+/intubated. Blood samples were collected within 2 days of admission/PCR testing. Metabolite concentration data, demographic data and clinical data were used to propose biomarkers and develop optimal regression models for the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 95% CI) was used to assess each models' predictive value. A panel that included the kynurenine: tryptophan ratio, lysoPC a C26:0, and pyruvic acid discriminated non-COVID controls from PCR+/not-hospitalized (AUC = 0.947; 95% CI 0.931-0.962). A second panel consisting of C10:2, butyric acid, and pyruvic acid distinguished PCR+/not-hospitalized from PCR+/hospitalized and PCR+/intubated (AUC = 0.975; 95% CI 0.968-0.983). Only lysoPC a C28:0 differentiated PCR+/hospitalized from PCR+/intubated patients (AUC = 0.770; 95% CI 0.736-0.803). If additional studies with targeted metabolomics confirm the diagnostic value of these plasma biomarkers, such panels could eventually be of clinical use in medical practice.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAdultBiomarkersCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalROC CurveBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34282210
PMCPMC8290000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.