ArticleScientific reports2021
Comparative and phylogenetic analyses of the chloroplast genomes of species of Paeoniaceae.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative genomics, phylogenomic reconstruction and divergence time analysis of 32Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of Loropetalum chinense and its purplish-red-flowered variety.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- The rps15-rpl32 intergenic locus is a phylogeographic marker for Latin American Zea mays landrace varieties and subspecies.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of EightCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of the complete chloroplast genome sequences of Melanoseris cyanea group.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intraspecific identification and genetic diversity analysis of Paeonia lactiflora based on chloroplast genes rpoB and psbK-psbI.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Plastid genome comparison and phylogenetic analyses of the Chinese group of medicinal species and related taxa withinFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The complete chloroplast genome of Mussaenda pubescens and phylogenetic analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The complete Chloroplast genome of Stachys geobombycis and comparative analysis with related Stachys species.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- First Record of Comparative Plastid Genome Analysis and Phylogenetic Relationships amongGenes · 2024Article
- The newly assembled chloroplast genome of Aeluropus littoralis: molecular feature characterization and phylogenetic analysis with related species.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of the chloroplast genome of Gleditsia species and comparative analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The complete chloroplast genome of the first registeredMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Whether niche changes promote the evolution of species: a case study ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genomes and the Phylogenetic Analysis of Three Native Species of Paeoniaceae from the Sino-Himalayan Flora Subkingdom.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Characterization and phylogenetic analyses of ten complete plastomes of Spiraea species.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- A comprehensive review on traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of Paeonia emodi Wall. ex Royle: current landscape and future perspectives.Chinese medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants belonging to family Paeoniaceae are not only economically important ornamental plants but also medicinal plants used as an important source of traditional Chinese medicine. Owing to the complex network evolution and polyploidy evolution of this family, its systematics and taxonomy are controversial and require a detailed investigation. In this study, three complete chloroplast genomes of sect. Paeonia, one of the sections of Paeonia, were sequenced and then analysed together with 16 other published chloroplast genomes of Paeoniaceae species. The total lengths of the chloroplast genomes of these species were 152,153-154,405 bp. A total of 82-87 protein-coding genes, 31-40 tRNA genes and 8 rRNA genes were annotated. Bioinformatics analysis revealed 61-74 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in the chloroplast genomes, most of which have A/T base preference. Codon usage analysis showed that A/U-ending codons were more positive than C/G-ending codons, and a slight bias in codon usage was observed in these species. A comparative analysis of these 19 species of Paeoniaceae was then conducted. Fourteen highly variable regions were selected for species relationship study. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the species of sect. Paeonia gathered in one branch and then divided into different small branches. P. lactiflora, P. anomala, P. anomala subsp. veitchii and P. mairei clustered together. P. intermedia was related to P. obovata and P. obovata subsp. willmottiae. P. emodi was the sister to all other species in the sect. Paeonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.