Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34282076›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021

Deep learning for abdominal ultrasound: A computer-aided diagnostic system for the severity of fatty liver.

Tsung-Hsien Chou, Hsing-Jung Yeh, Chun-Chao Chang, Jui-Hsiang Tang, Wei-Yu Kao, I-Chia Su, Chien-Hung Li, Wei-Hao Chang, Chun-Kai Huang, Herdiantri Sufriyana and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. To do one and to get more: Part I. Diabetes and bone.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tsung-Hsien ChouDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsing-Jung YehDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chun-Chao ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Jui-Hsiang TangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Wei-Yu KaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
I-Chia SuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chien-Hung LiAcer Value Lab Advanced Tech Business Unit, Acer Incorporated, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Wei-Hao ChangAcer Value Lab Advanced Tech Business Unit, Acer Incorporated, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Chun-Kai HuangAcer Value Lab Advanced Tech Business Unit, Acer Incorporated, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.
Herdiantri SufriyanaGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Emily Chia-Yu SuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Taipei Medical University Hospital · TWAcer (Taiwan) · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is increasing over time worldwide, with similar trends to those of diabetes and obesity. A liver biopsy, the gold standard of diagnosis, is not favored due to its invasiveness. Meanwhile, noninvasive evaluation methods of fatty liver are still either very expensive or demonstrate poor diagnostic performances, thus, limiting their applications. We developed neural network-based models to assess fatty liver and classify the severity using B-mode ultrasound (US) images.

methodsWe followed standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy guidelines to report this study. In this retrospective study, we utilized B-mode US images from a consecutive series of patients to develop four-class, two-class, and three-class diagnostic prediction models. The images were eligible if confirmed by at least two gastroenterologists. We compared pretrained convolutional neural network models, consisting of visual geometry group (VGG)19, ResNet-50 v2, MobileNet v2, Xception, and Inception v2. For validation, we utilized 20% of the dataset resulting in >100 images for each severity category.

resultsThere were 21,855 images from 2,070 patients classified as normal (N = 11,307), mild (N = 4,467), moderate (N = 3,155), or severe steatosis (N = 2,926). We used ResNet-50 v2 for the final model as the best ones. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.974 (mild steatosis vs others), 0.971 (moderate steatosis vs others), 0.981 (severe steatosis vs others), 0.985 (any severity vs normal), and 0.996 (moderate-to-severe steatosis/clinically abnormal vs normal-to-mild steatosis/clinically normal).

conclusionOur deep learning models achieved comparable predictive performances to the most accurate, yet expensive, noninvasive diagnostic methods for fatty liver. Because of the discriminative ability, including for mild steatosis, significant impacts on clinical applications for fatty liver are expected. However, we need to overcome machine-dependent variation, motion artifacts, lacking of second confirmation from any other tools, and hospital-dependent regional bias.

Indexed as

Deep LearningUltrasonographyAbdomenHumansNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePatient AcuityRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34282076
PMCPMC12966029
OpenAlexW3184356413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.