Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34281776›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2021

Lung transplantation using allografts with more than 8 hours of ischemic time: A single-institution experience.

Samantha E Halpern, Sandra Au, Samuel J Kesseli, Madison K Krischak, Danae G Olaso, Brandi A Bottiger, John C Haney, Jacob A Klapper, Matthew G Hartwig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Controlled Hypothermic Storage for Lung Preservation: Leaving the Ice Age Behind.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samantha E HalpernSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: samantha.halpern@duke.edu.
Sandra AuSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Samuel J KesseliDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Madison K KrischakSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Danae G OlasoSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Brandi A BottigerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
John C HaneyDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jacob A KlapperDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew G HartwigDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002555 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSix hours was historically regarded as the limit of acceptable ischemic time for lung allografts. However, broader sharing of donor lungs often necessitates use of allografts with ischemic time >6 hours. We characterized the association between ischemic time ≥8 hours and outcomes after lung transplantation using a contemporary cohort from a high-volume institution.

methodsPatients who underwent primary isolated bilateral lung transplantation between 1/2016 and 5/2020 were included. Patients bridged to transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation, and ex-vivo perfusion cases were excluded. Recipients were stratified by total allograft ischemic time <8 hours (standard) vs ≥8 hours (long). Perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival were compared between groups.

resultsOf 358 patients, 95 (26.5%) received long ischemic time (≥8 hours) lungs. Long ischemic time recipients were more likely to be male and have donation after circulatory death donors than standard ischemic time recipients. On unadjusted analysis, long and standard ischemic time recipients had similar survival, and similar rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-transplant, acute rejection within 30 days, reintubation, and post-transplant length of stay. After adjustment, long and standard ischemic time recipients had comparable risks of mortality or graft failure.

conclusionsIn a modern cohort, use of lung allografts with "long" ischemic time ≥8 hours were associated with acceptable perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival. Further investigation is required to better understand how broader use impacts post-lung transplant outcomes and the implications for smarter sharing under an evolving national allocation policy.

Indexed as

Lung TransplantationTissue DonorsAdultAgedAllograftsExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPrimary Graft DysfunctionRetrospective Studiesischemic timelung transplantationpatient survivalprimary graft dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID34281776
PMCPMC8570997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.