ArticlemAbs
Animal- versus
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Biophysical cartography of the native and human-engineered antibody landscapes quantifies the plasticity of antibody developability.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Methods to Discover and Validate Biofluid-Based Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Dementias.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Article
- Construction of Synthetic Antibody Phage Display Libraries.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent recommendations from the European Union Reference Laboratory regarding the generation of antibodies using animals have stimulated significant debate. Here, four of the scientists who served on the Scientific Advisory Committee provide clarification of their views regarding the use of animals and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.