Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34281187›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Best Practices and Progress in Precision-Cut Liver Slice Cultures.

Liza Dewyse, Hendrik Reynaert, Leo A van Grunsven

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. When Liver Slices Meet Single-cell Technology.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. GlobalNature metabolism · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liza DewyseLiver Cell Biology Research Group, Department of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Hendrik ReynaertDepartment of Gastro-Enterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Leo A van GrunsvenLiver Cell Biology Research Group, Department of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G042719NVrije Universiteit Brussel AAP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thirty-five years ago, precision-cut liver slices (PCLS) were described as a promising tool and were expected to become the standard in vitro model to study liver disease as they tick off all characteristics of a good in vitro model. In contrast to most in vitro models, PCLS retain the complex 3D liver structures found in vivo, including cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, and therefore should constitute the most reliable tool to model and to investigate pathways underlying chronic liver disease in vitro. Nevertheless, the biggest disadvantage of the model is the initiation of a procedure-induced fibrotic response. In this review, we describe the parameters and potential of PCLS cultures and discuss whether the initially described limitations and pitfalls have been overcome. We summarize the latest advances in PCLS research and critically evaluate PCLS use and progress since its invention in 1985.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLiverLiver DiseasesMicrotomyModels, BiologicalPractice Guidelines as TopicTissue Culture Techniques3Dchronic liver diseasein vitro liverPCLS

Identifiers

PMID34281187
PMCPMC8267882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.