Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34281108›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results.

Honoria Ocagli, Giulia Lorenzoni, Corrado Lanera, Alessandro Schiavo, Livio D'Angelo, Alessandro Di Liberti, Laura Besola, Giorgia Cibin, Matteo Martinato, Danila Azzolina and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Call to Expand the Scope of Digital Phenotyping.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Honoria OcagliUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-1659
Giulia LorenzoniUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1771-4686
Corrado LaneraUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0520-7428
Alessandro SchiavoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua Medical School, 35121 Padua, Italy.
Livio D'AngeloDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua Medical School, 35121 Padua, Italy.
Alessandro Di LibertiDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua Medical School, 35121 Padua, Italy.
Laura BesolaSaint Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6 VBC, Canada.
Giorgia CibinCardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2584-2613
Matteo MartinatoUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-1738
Danila AzzolinaUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-5742
Augusto D'OnofrioCardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Giuseppe TarantiniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua Medical School, 35121 Padua, Italy.
Gino GerosaCardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Ester CabiancaCardiology Unit, Dipartimento Strutturale Cardio-vascolare, Azienda ULSS 8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7906-0580
University of Padua · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable devices (WDs) can objectively assess patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in clinical trials. In this study, the feasibility and acceptability of using commercial WDs in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) will be explored. This is a prospective observational study. Participants were trained to use a WD and a smartphone to collect data on their physical activity, rest heart rate and number of hours of sleep. Validated questionnaires were also used to evaluate these outcomes. A technology acceptance questionnaire was used at the end of the follow up. In our participants an overall good compliance in wearing the device (75.1% vs. 79.8%, SAVR vs. TAVR) was assessed. Half of the patients were willing to continue using the device. Perceived ease of use is one of the domains that scored higher in the technology acceptance questionnaire. In this study we observed that the use of a WD is accepted in our frail population for an extended period. Even though commercial WDs are not tailored for clinical research, they can produce useful information on patient behavior, especially when coordinated with intervention tailored to the single patient.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationWearable Electronic DevicesAgedFeasibility StudiesHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomefeasibilityphysical functionsurgical aortic valve replacementtranscatheter aortic valve replacementwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID34281108
PMCPMC8297062
OpenAlexW3182246704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.