Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34281082›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Mercury and Prenatal Growth: A Systematic Review.

Kyle Dack, Matthew Fell, Caroline M Taylor, Alexandra Havdahl, Sarah J Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Maternal Mercury Exposure and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Environmental toxicants and placental function.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyle DackMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0319-590X
Matthew FellCleft Collective, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7776-2877
Caroline M TaylorCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1NU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-5092
Alexandra HavdahlDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0456 Oslo, Norway.
Sarah J LewisMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.
University of Bristol · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/T010010/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrauterine environment is critical for healthy prenatal growth and affects neonatal survival and later health. Mercury is a toxic metal which can freely cross the placenta and disrupt a wide range of cellular processes. Many observational studies have investigated mercury exposure and prenatal growth, but no prior review has synthesised this evidence. Four relevant publication databases (Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus) were systematically searched to identify studies of prenatal mercury exposure and birth weight, birth length, or head circumference. Study quality was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool, and results synthesised in a narrative review. Twenty-seven studies met the review criteria, these were in 17 countries and used 8 types of mercury biomarker. Studies of birth weight (total = 27) involving populations with high levels of mercury exposure, non-linear methods, or identified as high quality were more likely to report an association with mercury, but overall results were inconsistent. Most studies reported no strong evidence of association between mercury and birth length (n = 14) or head circumference (n = 14). Overall, our review did not identify strong evidence that mercury exposure leads to impaired prenatal growth, although there was some evidence of a negative association of mercury with birth weight.

Indexed as

MercuryBiomarkersBirth WeightDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal ExposurePlacentaPregnancyBiomarkersMercurybirth lengthbirth weightchildhoodhead circumferencemercurypregnancyprenatal growthsystematic reviewtoxic metal

Identifiers

PMID34281082
PMCPMC8297189
OpenAlexW3182827432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.