ReviewAnnual review of psychology2022
Diversity Training Goals, Limitations, and Promise: A Review of the Multidisciplinary Literature.
Review in Annual review of psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of diversity, equity, and inclusion and antiracism training studies: Findings and future directions.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Pooled it
- S.E.L.F.: Lessons in institutional cultural humility approach from an academic health center.Dialogues in health · 2026Article
- Article
- Gender-based disparities in self-reported procedural experience: a cross-sectional survey of medical students in Poland.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Adapting Intervention Mapping to Improve Patient-Centeredness of Mental Health Services.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025Article
- Measuring STEM Instructors' Learning of and Growth in Inclusive Teaching: Development and Evaluation of the STEM Faculty Inclusive Teaching Survey (FITS).CBE life sciences education · 2025Article
- How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2025Review
- When People Do Allyship: A Typology of Allyship Action.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2025Review
- Article
- Anti-Racism Efforts in Healthcare: A Selective Review From a Social Cognitive Perspective.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2023Article
- Developing scientifically validated bias and diversity trainings that work: empowering agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity.Management decision · 2023Article
- Expanding Workplace Inclusion of Employees Who Are Parents of Children with Disabilities through Diversity Training.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Paradox of diversity in the collective brain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Critical Faculty and Peer Instructor Development: Core Components for Building Inclusive STEM Programs in Higher Education.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- What Happened and Why: Responding to Racism, Discrimination, and Microaggressions in the Clinical Learning Environment.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- Future Directions in Mental Health Treatment with Stigmatized Youth.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this review, we utilize a narrative approach to synthesize the multidisciplinary literature on diversity training. In examining hundreds of articles on the topic, we discovered that the literature is amorphous and complex and does not allow us to reach decisive conclusions regarding best practices in diversity training. We note that scholars of diversity training, when testing the efficacy of their approaches, too often use proxy measures for success that are far removed from the types of consequential outcomes that reflect the purported goals of such trainings. We suggest that the enthusiasm for, and monetary investment in, diversity training has outpaced the available evidence that such programs are effective in achieving their goals. We recommend that researchers and practitioners work together for future investigations to propel the science of diversity training forward. We conclude with a roadmap for how to create a more rigorous and relevant science of diversity training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.