Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34280058›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of drug and alcohol abuse2021

A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in cannabis use disorder amongst people with comorbid mental illness.

Karolina Kozak, Philip H Smith, Darby J E Lowe, Andrea H Weinberger, Ziva D Cooper, Rachel A Rabin, Tony P George

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Differences in alcohol and cannabis use amongst substance use disorder patients with and without comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karolina KozakInstitute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Philip H SmithDepartment of Kinesiology and Health, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
Darby J E LoweInstitute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea H WeinbergerFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University and the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7065-1349
Ziva D CooperDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8001-2332
Rachel A RabinDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University and the Douglas Mental Health Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6530-0288
Tony P GeorgeInstitute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1645-9767

Funding

Sex-dependent effects of cannabis: Assessing abuse-related and pharmacokinetic differences between men and womenR01DA047296 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COOPER, ZIVA D · 2019 to 2024
$3.5M
Effects of rTMS on Cannabis Use and Cognitive Outcomes in SchizophreniaR21DA043949 · NIDA · CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH · PI GEORGE, TONY P · 2017 to 2018
$286k
CIHRNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047296NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA043949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile males are more likely diagnosed with cannabis use disorder (CUD), females are more susceptible to developing and maintaining CUD. Yet, for both sexes, CUD is associated with high rates of comorbid mental illness (MI).

objectivesTo identify and compare sex differences in the prevalence of comorbid CUD amongst individuals with/without MIs.

methodsThis systematic review generated pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from 37 studies (including clinical trials, cohort, and case-control studies) among individuals with and without MIs, quantifying sex differences in rates of comorbid CUD. A meta-analysis was also completed.

resultsIn the CUD-only group, males were twice as likely to have CUD than females (OR = 2.0, CI = 1.9-2.1). Among MIs, males were more likely than females to have CUD comorbid with schizophrenia (OR ~2.6, CI = 2.5-2.7) and other psychotic, mood, and substance use disorders (1> OR <2.2, CI = 0.7-2.6). The reverse association (females > males) was observed for anxiety disorders and antisocial personality disorder (OR = 0.8, CI = 0.7-1.0). Among females, MIs increased the likelihood of having CUD, except for psychotic disorders and depression. A meta-analysis was inconclusive due to high heterogeneity across studies. Thus, comparisons across MI groups were not possible.

conclusionWhile males are more likely to be diagnosed with CUD, there are important sex differences in the prevalence of CUD across MI diagnoses that should be taken into account when approaching CUD prevention and determining treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

ComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMental DisordersOdds RatioPrevalenceSex DistributionSex Factorsbipolar disorderCannabiscannabis use disordercomorbiditydepressionmental illnessmeta-analysisschizophreniasex differences

Identifiers

PMID34280058
PMCPMC9144491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.