Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34279753›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Prospective Study Using the BREAST-Q.

Ilona Stolpner, Jörg Heil, Fabian Riedel, Markus Wallwiener, Benedikt Schäfgen, Manuel Feißt, Michael Golatta, André Hennigs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilona StolpnerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jörg HeilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt SchäfgenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel FeißtInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael GolattaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
André HennigsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. andre.Hennigs@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor patient-reported satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has been associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and subsequent depression in retrospective analysis. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the HRQOL of patients who have undergone BCT using the BREAST-Q, and to identify clinical risk factors for lower patient satisfaction.

methodsPatients with primary breast cancer undergoing BCT were asked to complete the BREAST-Q preoperatively (T1) for baseline evaluation, then 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively (T2), and finally 1 year after surgery (T3). Clinicopathologic data were extracted from the patients' charts. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences in mean satisfaction and well-being levels among the test intervals. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction.

resultsThe study enrolled 250 patients. The lowest baseline BREAST-Q score was reported for "satisfaction with breast" (mean, 61 ± 19), but this increased postoperatively (mean, 66 ± 18) and was maintained at the 1 year follow-up evaluation (mean, 67 ± 21). "Physical well-being" decreased from T1 (mean, 82 ± 17) to T2 (mean, 28 ± 13) and did not recover much by T3 (mean, 33 ± 13), being the lowest BREAST-Q score postoperatively and in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. In multiple regression, baseline psychosocial well-being, body mass index (BMI), and type of incision were risk factors for lower "satisfaction with breasts."

conclusionBoth the aesthetic/surgery-related and psychological aspects are equally important with regard to "satisfaction with breasts" after BCT. The data could serve as the benchmark for future studies.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQuality of LifeHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34279753
PMCPMC8591011
OpenAlexW3185464238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.