Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021
Effect of SAcubitril/Valsartan on left vEntricular ejection fraction and on the potential indication for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in primary prevention: the SAVE-ICD study.
Observational study in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03935087 (Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in ICD Patients Undergoing Therapy With Sacubitril/Valsartan and Potential Impact on ICD Implant Rates for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improvement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in ICD Patients Undergoing Therapy With Sacubitril/Valsartan and Potential Impact on ICD Implant Rates for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death (SAVE-ICD)
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Delayed left ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review.Open heart · 2026Article
- Appropriate ICD Therapies in Primary Prevention: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of Contemporary and Historic Heart Failure Cohorts.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Evaluation and management of recent onset cardiomyopathy in the current era of heart failure therapeutics: a clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Left Ventricular Hypertrabeculation and Ventricular Arrhythmias.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term prognosis of pure and impure tachycardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2025Observational
- Comparative analysis of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator efficacy in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with heart failure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Role of ARNI in Enhancing Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Left ventricular function improvement during angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor treatment in a cohort of HFrEF/HFmrEF patients.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- The Timing for Primary Prevention for ICD in the Current Era of Pharmacotherapy.Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Wearable defibrillator to improve accuracy in selecting candidates to implantable defibrillator: A real-world experience.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Novel Medical Treatments and Devices for the Management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Left ventricular reverse remodeling following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low blood pressure.Heart and vessels · 2024Article
- Reply to: Clinical utility of remote monitoring using multiparametric implantable defibrillators algorithm.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan Prior to Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation.CJC open · 2023Article
- Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction: Insight into the Variable Nature of Left Ventricular Systolic Function.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Sacubitril/valsartan reduces indications for arrhythmic primary prevention in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: insights from DISCOVER-ARNI, a multicenter Italian register.European heart journal open · 2022Article
- Cardiac Reverse Remodelling by 2D and 3D Echocardiography in Heart Failure Patients Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSacubitril/valsartan has been associated with a positive reverse left ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These patients may also benefit from an ICD implant. We aimed to assess EF improvement after 6 months of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, evaluating when ICD as primary prevention was no longer indicated.
methodsMulticentre, observational, prospective study enrolling all consecutive patients with HFrEF and EF ≤ 35% with an ICD as primary prevention and starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (NCT03935087). Resynchronization therapy and patients experiencing appropriate ICD therapies before sacubitril/valsartan were excluded.
resultsTwo-hundred-and-thirty patients were enrolled (73.9% males, mean age 64.3 ± 12.1 years) After 6 months of treatment, a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes was noted and LVEF increased from 28.3 ± 5.6% to 32.2 ± 6.5% (p < 0.001). At 6 months, a non-ischemic aetiology of cardiomyopathy and a final dose of sacubitril/valsartan > 24/26 mg twice daily were associated with a higher probability of an absolute increase of > 5% in LVEF. A total of 5.3% of primary prevention patients still had an arrhythmic event in the first 6 months after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan started.
conclusionsSacubitril/valsartan improves systolic function in HFrEF, mainly due to reverse left ventricular remodelling. Improvement in EF after 6 months of treatment could help prevent ICD implantation in nearly one out of four patients, with important clinical and economic implications. However, the risk of sudden cardiac death in this recovered HFrEF population has not been thoroughly studied, and the present data should be interpreted only as hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.