Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34279626›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2022

Intergenerational change in anthropometry of children and adolescents in the New Delhi Birth Cohort.

Sikha Sinha, Dheeraj Shah, Clive Osmond, Caroline H D Fall, Santosh K Bhargava, Harshpal Singh Sachdev

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delayed Puberty.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sikha SinhaDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India.
Dheeraj ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Clive OsmondMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Caroline H D FallMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Santosh K BhargavaFounder, New Delhi Birth Cohort, New Delhi, India.
Harshpal Singh SachdevDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4956-9391
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBSitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research · INUniversity College of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/15/4/31493Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1016Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA comparison of the anthropometry of children and adolescents with that of their parents at the same age may provide a more precise measure of intergenerational changes in linear growth and body mass index (BMI).

methodsNew Delhi Birth Cohort participants (F1), born between 1969 and 1972, were followed up for anthropometry at birth and at 6-monthly intervals until 21 years of age. At variable intervals 1447 children, aged 0-19 years (F2) and born to 818 F1 participants, were measured (weight and height), providing 2236 sets of anthropometries. Intergenerational changes (F2-F1) in height and BMI [absolute and standard deviation (SD) units] were computed by comparing children with their parents at corresponding ages.

resultsF2 children were taller (P < 0.001) than their parents at corresponding ages; the increase {mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] World Health Organization SD units} was 0.97 (0.83, 1.11), 1.21 (1.10, 1.32), 1.09 (0.98, 1.19), 1.10 (1.00, 1.21) and 0.75 (0.65, 0.85) for age categories of 0-5, 5-7.5, 7.5-10, 10-12.5 and >12.5 years, respectively. In absolute terms, this increase ranged from 3.5 cm (0-5-year-olds) to 7.5 cm (10-12.5-year-olds). The corresponding increases in BMI SD scores were 0.32 (0.18, 0.47), 0.60 (0.45, 0.75), 1.13 (0.99, 1.27), 1.30 (1.15, 1.45) and 1.00 (0.85, 1.15), respectively. The absolute BMI increase ranged from 1-3 kg/m2 at >5 years age to ∼3 kg/m2 at >10-years of age. The intergenerational increases were comparable in both sexes, but were greater in children born and measured later. A positive change in socioeconomic status was associated with an increase in height across the generations.

conclusionsChildren and adolescents, throughout the ages 0-19 years, have become considerably taller and have a higher BMI than their parents at corresponding ages in an urban middle-class Indian population undergoing socioeconomic improvements.

Indexed as

Birth CohortBody HeightAdolescentAdultAnthropometryBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleYoung AdultAnthropometrybody mass indexgrowthheightintergenerational changesobesitysecular trend

Identifiers

PMID34279626
PMCPMC8855995
OpenAlexW3185864328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.